University earns high marks for reaching 5-year goals

As Brown entered the 1990s, it found itself facing severe budget constraints and hurdles, including $55 million in pressing deferred maintenance needs, low salaries for full professors compared to other Ivy schools, critical needs in the library system and soaring health care costs.

In order to achieve its highest priorities in the face of such challenges, University administrators and others devised a long-term plan. Budget adjustments begun in 1990 were followed in February 1992 by "Looking Toward the Year 2000," a strategic planning document that would guide the University through 1996. The two-volume report outlined a variety of goals and 515 action items.

Did Brown accomplish what the strategic plan set out to do? To a great extent, yes, according to a report issued by Brian L. Hawkins, vice president for academic planning and administration.

Of the 515 action items, 97 percent have been accomplished, according to the report. "If one looks at the percentage of action items achieved by administrative unit, one sees that the percentage of accomplishment ranges from 85 percent to 100 percent," Hawkins wrote. "Academic units achieved 92 percent, the academic and support services units achieved 97 percent, and the administrative units achieved 98 percent of all the action items set out for their respective areas. This consistency in the level of accomplishment for all areas reflects positively on the overall process and the level of achievement and productivity across the University during this past five-year period."

The report also credited the Campaign for the Rising Generation for its important role in funding many of the priorities set out in the strategic plan.

Some of the achieved action items:

"During the past five to six years, virtually all of Brown's financial indicators have improved, as reflected in the bond rating for Brown increasing from Aa to Aa1, the highest level ever achieved by the University," Hawkins wrote. "Brown's financial position is stronger, and the institution is better positioned to handle difficult downturns in revenue sources, because of the many plans, corrections and actions taken during the past five years."

As the University enters a new phase of long-range planning, Hawkins's report will help determine which unaccomplished items should be considered priorities and which unfunded priorities should be carried into the next phase of planning.