|
Physician studies fate of ill children ‘treated’ by faith
healing
Many cases of religiously motivated medical neglect never
become public due to cover-ups, lack of investigations and poor record keeping,
according to postdoctoral fellow's research.
by Scott J. Turner
Most pediatric research takes place in a medical or
scientific setting such as a clinic or lab. But one postdoctoral fellow in
forensic pediatrics is more likely to conduct his work in a cemetery. Seth
Asser, M.D., studies the deaths of children due to medical neglect on religious
grounds.
In the past 15 years, more
than 200 children have died in the United States because their parents relied
exclusively on faith to heal them. The children died of treatable ailments such
as diabetes or dehydration.
“Typical parents cannot relate to this topic because it
is so unbelievable,” said Asser. “But freedom of belief
doesn’t allow you to throw away a young life.”
Last year Asser became a
fellow at the Medical School and at Hasbro Children’s Hospital after
working close to 20 years as an intensive-care pediatrician, primarily in San
Diego and San Antonio. He is also a former medical director for the
county-administered California Children Services in San Diego.
In 1998, Asser published a
paper in the journal Pediatrics that evaluated the deaths of 172 children
between 1975 and 1995 from families of 23 religious groups whose rituals
dictated that healing must occur through prayer. The article was the largest
study ever conducted of such deaths
The study found that 140 fatalities “were from
conditions for which survival rates with medical care would have exceeded 90
percent,” and that overall only three children would likely not have benefited
from medical care. “Not only did they die needlessly, but many of the
deaths were slow and painful,” Asser said.
Public
officials, said Asser’s co-author, Rita Swan, have long ignored these
deaths. Swan is
president of Children’s Healthcare Is a Legal Duty (CHILD). This Iowa-based nonprofit organization works to protect
children from abusive religious and cultural practices, especially
religion-based medical neglect.
There are
“many laws that allow parents to deprive their children of various kinds
of health care on religious grounds,” said Swan. “The religious
exemption laws are a rare example of discrimination de jure: laws that deprive
one group of children of protections afforded to others.”
Many cases of religiously motivated medical neglect never
become public due to cover-ups, lack of investigations and poor record keeping,
Asser said. His most recent findings provide bone-chilling evidence that some
individuals and groups look outside of medicine for healing illness and
disease.
Asser studied the deaths of
youngsters in an obscure religious congregation. In 1998, 78 graves of children
buried since 1955 were discovered in a cemetery of the Followers of Christ
Church in the suburbs of Oregon City. The finding sparked widespread publicity
about poor record keeping and inadequate investigations.
Last fall Asser flew to
Oregon to examine public records for information about cause of death. He tramped through mud to record data on the children buried
in the Followers of Christ cemetery. Asser combed through the
group’s telephone directory and counted the
people coming to a service at the Followers church, as he stood on the sidewalk
receiving their hostile glares.
These methods allowed Asser
to compare the proportion of child deaths for the group with statewide numbers.
Children born into the Followers of Christ Church were 4.5 times more likely to
die compared to peers in the surrounding population, he found.
“Once again many of the deaths were from conditions
easily prevented or treatable,” Asser said. After the deaths were
publicized, Oregon repealed laws giving religious exemptions to charges of
child abuse, neglect, manslaughter, criminal mistreatment, and criminal
nonsupport.
In fact, no children in the
Oregon Followers of Christ Church have died of medical neglect since the
repeal, Asser said, and members were witnessed taking children to doctors. Concluded Asser, “To stop these
preventable deaths, other states should promptly repeal similar exemption
laws.”
“Children don't have
the option of saying ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to care if their
parents decide to deny them that care,” said Carole Jenny, M.D.,
professor of pediatrics and director of the Child Protection Program at Hasbro
Children's Hospital.
“In
addition, children are not competent to understand the long-term consequences
of foregoing medical care in life-threatening situations,” she said. “Society needs to make sure they
are protected until they are able to make those decisions on their own.”
Jenny is
“proud” of Asser’s work. Religiously-motivated medical
neglect is “not a popular topic to study – people are often afraid
to stand up for these kids,” she said.“Many powerful institutions are on the ‘other
side’ of the issue.”
Swan thinks
that few physicians would have the patience to gather the information that
Asser does. "It's quite a tedious project to track down data on these
kids," she said, adding that "a coroner who has not reported a
child's death to law enforcement may not be happy to have a researcher inquire
about a case and implicitly expose the coroner's indifference."
Asser has followed the
events in Attleboro, Mass., closely. There, two religious sect members have
been charged with murder in the starvation death of their year-old son. Two
other religious sect members were jailed for refusing to provide information on
the whereabouts of their child or its remains.
“Despite the local tradition of independence in New
England,” Asser said, “we don’t tolerate people who dispose
of children as if they were used tissues.”
Asser said he would
continue to collect data on religion-motivated medical neglect to “push
legislators to change laws.” He advocates for medical care for a simple
reason: It saves lives.
“Witnesses to some of these deaths tell how the babies
died,” Asser said. “Each story is worse than the last. They died in
pain. They died horribly. They died within easy access to top-notch medical
facilities. These are examples of how hard-headed some parents can be in the
face of what is reasonable and logical and good – protecting and saving
the lives of their own children.”
|