|

Name:
Amy Mendel
Brown Affiliation: grad
'01
Company/School: Wolf,
Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Position:
Patent Agent
Degree(s) Earned:
Brown University, Sc.B. in Biomedical Engineering
'01
Suffolk University Law School, expected JD in '06
Contact
Info
|
|
What is your
educational background — advanced degrees do you have (if any) and are
they a must for what you do?
Brown University, Sc.B.
in Biomedical Engineering '01
Suffolk University Law
School, expected JD in '06
To be eligible to take
the patent bar (different from the legal bar), one must have an
engineering or science degree (it is possible to circumvent this
requirement; see the admission
guidelines
for more information).
To be a patent
attorney (vs. agent), one must graduate from law school and pass the
legal bar.
What positions did
you hold before your current position (what other jobs led you to where
you are now)?
Although I was a
barista at Starbucks, this was my first full-time job out of
college. I did an internship at GTE (now General Dynamics) over my
junior summer which helped me conclude that I did NOT want to work at an
engineering firm in a cubicle. Having this internship on my resume
made a significant contribution to obtaining a non-entry-level job offer
straight out of college.
What are your
favorite aspects of you job? What are the drawbacks?
POSITIVES: I can
honestly say that I love the work that I do. No day's work is ever
the same; I'm constantly learning new technologies in addition to nuances
of patent law; and I work with energetic and excited inventors. A
large part of my job satisfaction is derived from my colleagues and the
culture of the firm; it's a very warm, inclusive, non-competitive
environment that encourages having a life outside of work (when I first
started I was actually reprimanded from staying at work past 6pm!).
We also receive a lot of positive and constructive feedback both from
colleagues and clients; this may sound strange but after leaving an
academic environment where every few weeks/months you receive an
evaluation of your work, going into a job where you work just as hard and
receive no feedback (good or bad) may be a difficult adjustment;
therefore, feedback is welcomed.
DRAWBACKS: Currently
the biggest drawback for me is law school; I really don't enjoy most of
the required classes and find the time commitment to be intense.
Work-wise the biggest drawback is that a large portion of my day is spent
working at my desk and with only 10-20% of my time spent interacting with
colleagues and clients. As I advance in my career a much greater
percentage of my time will be spent with clients and colleagues, in
addition to training junior people, which will help alleviate the lack of
interaction.
What advice do you
have for someone who is thinking about pursuing a career in your area?
You must be able to
multi-task; in one day you may be working on anywhere from one to fifteen
different client matters in addition to having twenty to forty matters on
your docket. You have to enjoy reading and writing in addition to
the technological aspects. Also, you have to be willing to make the
four year time commitment that attending law school part-time requires.
What do you look
for in a potential job candidate/ what qualities are most important for
someone in your field?
Standard requirements
include a solid technical background (in some areas of IP law, such as
Biotech or Chemistry, a masters, PhD, or significant work experience is
likely required) and the abilities to read and write well, to multi-task
and to communicate effectively (both orally and written). I've found
that almost all of the people that we interview have the technical
qualifications; therefore, what I look for is someone with people skills
(e.g. how to read people, communicate with clients, interact with
colleagues, network, etc…). A good portion of the legal business
is networking and client management.
Someone once told me
is there are three types of lawyers that make up a successful firm:
Finders, Minders and Grinders. Finders go out and find/bring in
clients; Minders tend to and keep the clients happy once they're with the
firm; Grinders churn out the actual work product. Every lawyer
should have the ability to act in each of these roles, so expressing your
ability to network, manage projects and create a great, efficient work
product will bode well for your future as an IP attorney.
Would you be
willing to serve as a contact for Brown students who are interested in
your field (to answer further questions about your work)? If so what
is your preferred mode of contact (phone, email, fax, etc.)?
The thing that I've
found easiest is for you to send me an e-mail introducing yourself,
telling me a bit about your background and what you'd like to discuss with
me. Then either I'll call you or you can call me at work, as that's
the easiest time to reach me.
|