SARS-CoV: Diagnosis & Treatment |
|
| Diagnosis & Treatment Diagnosis Serological Assays Clinical Presentation Treatment Strategies Home Epidemiology Disease Pathology Diagnosis & Treatment The Pathogen Immune Response Vaccine Development Global Health Response References Disclaimer |
Differentiating SARS from other respiratory tract infections is difficult, especially during winter flu months. Serological assays involve detecting, in patient blood, antibodies specific to SARS-CoV that do not cross-react with other coronaviruses. IgM can be detected in the blood as early as 3-4 days post infection, whereas IgG is not produced till at least 10 days after infection. RT-PCR assays are also used to detect viral mRNA specific to SARS in the nasopharyngeal aspirates of patients within three days of infection. This method provides a quick and sensitive way of detecting the presence of SARS-CoV in the patient. SARS-CoV specific monoclonal antibodies may be manufactured by inoculating animal models with SARS-CoV antigens and isolating the antibodies from the animal. These antibodies can then be used to detect the presence of SARS-CoV in patients' blood (70). Serological assays developped for the diagnosis of SARS would be useful in the event of future outbreaks. Current PCR techniques are time-consuming and difficult to perform. Additionally, serodiagnosis of SARS would circumvent the need for BSL-3 facilities. Tan et al. (120) have characterized antibody profiles against proteins expressed by SARS-CoV. Proteins were expressed and individually tested for reactivity with sera samples from 81 patients. All samples showed reactivity toward N protein, while 73% were reactive toward U274, which is a protein unique to SARS-CoV. Additionally, it was found that while all convalescent-phase sera were reactive toward S protein, acute phase sera (2-9 days after the onset of illness) were not, suggesting that anti-N antibodies appear earlier than anti-S antibodies during in the humoral immune response. None of the 100 control sera from healthy donors reacted, attesting to the high specificity of the antibodies. As such, serological assays could be devloped using recombinant N, S, and U274 proteins. In another study by Timani et al. (124), N protein was cloned, sequenced, and expressed in E. coli . It was found that at 10, 20, and 30 days after the onset of disease, 13/16 (81.3%), 16/16 (100%), and 16/16 (100%) of SARS patients' sera exhibited significant positive responses to N protein, respectively, implying that anti-N IgG is commonly present at 10 days after disease onset. Additionally, none of the 131 control samples reacted, indicating the possibility of developping highly specific and sensitive N protein ELISAs for use in serodiagnosis. It hsould be cautioned, however, that cross-reactivity with the other known human coronaviruses (HCoV's) would have to be investigated, since conserved regions of N protein across different coronaviruses could lead to incorrect diagnoses. Finally, it should be noted that similar approaches using N protein in DNA vaccination have been studied in related coronaviruses. For example, Liu et al. (78) found that DNA immunization with N protein from porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) induced immunity via T cell activation and memory.
Antiviral drug screening & design Immunomodulation siRNA technology |
Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
Bio160: Development of Vaccines to Infectious Diseases
Shirley Chan, H. Jonathan Chong, Tevis Howard, Sarah Kimball, Michael Soule
April 2004