Lifelines

Volume 5
Summer 2001

"Genetic Influences on Human Behavior and Development"

Recommended Readings


Other Articles in this Issue:

Director's Welcome

Selected Responses:
Genetic Influences on Human Behavior and Development

Recommended Readings


"This genetics of behavior offers more opportunity for media sensationalism than any other branch of current science. Frequent news reports claim that researchers have discovered the "gene for" such traits as aggression, intelligence, criminality, homosexuality, feminine intuition, and even bad luck. Such reports tend to suggest, usually incorrectly, that there is a direct correspondence between carrying a mutation in the gene and manifesting the trait or disorder. Rarely is it mentioned that traits involving behavior are likely to have a more complex genetic basis. This is probably because most journalists-in common with most educated laypeople (and some biologists)-tend to have a straightforward, single-gene view of genetics. But single genes do not determine most human behaviors. Only certain rare disorders such as Huntington's disease have a simple mode of transmission in which a specific mutation confers the certainty of developing the disorder. Most types of behavior have no such clear-cut pattern and depend on interplay between environmental factors and multiple genes. Genes in such multiple-gene systems are called quantitative trait loci (QTLs), because they are likely to result in continuous (quantitative) distribution of phenotypes that underlie susceptibility to common disorders."

McGuffin, P.; Riley, B.; Plomin, R. (2001).

Bronfenbrenner, U., and Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture re-conceptualized in developmental perspective: A bio-ecological model. Psychological Review. (Vol. 101, 4: 568-586).

Collins, A.W., Maccoby, E. E., Steinberg, L., Hetherington, M., Bornstein, M. H. (February 2000). Contemporary Research on Parenting: The Case for Nature and Nurture. American Psychologist. (Vol. 3, 2: 218- 233).

de Waal, F. B. M. (December 1999). The end of nature versus nurture. Scientific American. (Vol. 281, 6: 94-100).

Dickens, W. T., Flynn, J. R. (2001). Heritabilty Estimates Versus Large Environmental Effects: The IQ Paradox Resolved. Psychological Review. (Vol. 108, 2).

Gottlieb, G. (1997). Synthesizing nature-nurture: Prenatal roots of instinctive behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gottlieb, G. (1998). Normally occurring environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity: from central dogma to probabilistic epigenesis. Psychological Review. (Vol. 105, 4: 792).

Hirsch, J. (1997). Some history of heredity-vs-environment, genetic inferiority at Harvard (?), and The (incredible) Bell Curve. Genetica. (Vol. 99: 207-224).

Hirsch, J. (1997). The triumph of wishful thinking over genetic irrelevance. Current Psychology of Cognition. Marseilles, France: ADRSC. (Vol. 16: 711-720).

Horowitz, F. D. (2000). Child development and the PITS: Simple questions, complex answers, and developmental theory. Child Development. (Vol. 71: 1-10).

Human Genome Program, U.S. Department of Energy, Human Genome News (Vol. 11: 1-2). http://www.ornl.gov/hgmis/publicat/hgn/v11n1/04draft.html.

Jacquard, A. (1983). Heritability: One word, three concepts. Biometrics. (Vol. 39: 465- 477).

Kempthorne, O. (1978). Logical, epistemological and statistical aspects of nature-nurture data interpretation (a Biometrics invited paper). Biometrics. (Vol. 34: 1-23).

Lerner, R. M. (1978). Nature, nurture, and dynamic interactionism. Human Development. (Vol. 21: 1-20).

Lerner, R. M. (1991). Changing organism-context relations as the basic process of development: A developmental contextual perspective. Developmental Psychology. (Vol. 27: 27-32).

Lewontin, R. C. (2000). The triple helix: gene, organism, and environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

McGuffin, P., Riley, B., Plomin, R. (2001). Toward behavioral genomics. Science. (Vol. 291, 5507: 1232)

Morse, A. (1998). Searching for the Holy Grail: The Human Genome Project and Its Implications. Journal of Law and Health. (Vol. 219).

Overton, W. F. (1999). Understanding, explanation, and reductionism: Finding a cure for Cartesian anxiety. Paper presented at the 29th Annual Symposium of the Jean Piaget Society, Mexico City, Mexico.

Oyama, S. (2000). Evolution's Eye: A System's View of the Biology-Culture Divide. Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press.

Oyama, S., Griffiths, P. E., Gray, R.D. (2001). Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution (Life and Mind: Philosophical Issues in Biology and Psychology). New York, NY: Bradford Books.

Plomin, R. (2000). Behavioral genetics in the 21st century. International Journal of Behavioral Development. (Vol. 24: 30-34).

Phelps, J. A., et al., (1997). Nature, Nurture, and Twin Research Strategies. Current Directions in Psychological Science. (Vol. 6: 117-121).

Reiss, D., Neiderhiser, J. (2000). The interplay of genetic influences and social processes in developmental theory: Specific mechanisms are coming into view. Development and Psychopathology. Cambridge University Press. (Vol. 12: 357-374).

Reiss, D., Neiderhiser, J., Mavis, E., Hetherington, Plomin, R. (2000). The Relationship Code Deciphering Genetic and Social Influences on Adolescent Development (Adolescent Lives). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Spencer, M. B. (1995). Old issues and new theorizing about African American Youth: A phenomenological variant of ecological systems theory. In R. L. Taylor (Ed.), Black youth: Perspectives on their status in the United States. Westport, CT: Praeger. (37-70).

Spencer, M. B. and Harpalani, V. (2001). Nature, nurture, and the question of how: A Phenomenological Variant of Ecological Systems Theory (PVEST). Paper presented at Brown University's Center for Study of Human Development conference, "Genetic Influences on Human Behavior and Development," Providence, RI.

Suomi, S. J. (2000). Behavioral inhibition and impulsive aggressiveness: insights from studies with rhesus monkeys. In Balter, L. and Tamis-Lamode, C. (Eds.), Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. (510-525).

Vandell, D. L. (November 2000). Parents, Peer Groups, and other Socializing Influences. Developmental Psychology. (Vol. 36, 6: 699-711).

West, M. J., King, A. P. (1987). Settling nature and nurture into an ontogenetic niche. Developmental Psychology. (Vol. 20: 549-562).

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science. Office of Biological and Environmental Research. Human Genome Program. www.ornl.gov/hgmis.

|CSHD Publications|
|Brown University| |CSHD Home| |Education Department|

This issue of Lifelines was prepared for the Center for the Study of Human Development at Brown University by Isabel Storey, Senior Communications Consultant, Glen Peck and Jane Comaroff, with funds from the Mittlemann Family Endowment .


Copyright 2001, all rights reserved. Brown University 2001