11/11/2005

Forza! in all its forms…

Filed under: — rala @ 1:43 am

As we look more closely at the Villani encoding, we are looking to clean up and simplify as much as possible. Some series of attributes are naturally infinite, such as the names of persons or names of places. On the other hand, we have one set of attributes “natura”, under type=”forza”, under the element “theme”. They are as follows:

Giustizia, forca, Condanna, Multa confinamento, Prigione, Guerra, Guerra esilio, ribellione, attacco, Assalto, Confiscazione, Mutilazione, Incendio, Assassinio, presa citta, Guerra presa citta, Congiuro, Arresto tortura, Assissinio mutilamento, Assassinio, Mutilamento cannabalismo, Esilio, Guerra presacastello, Assassinio, Blocco, Guerra, Assedio, Ostaggio, Assedio, Ribellione Guerra, Condanna esilio, Scomunica, Tortura forca, Mutilamento, Confinamento, Furto, Tortura multa, ribellione, Guerra cattura, Presacitta, Presacastello, Giustizia, Confina, Forca cattura, forca condanna

Would it be helpful or not helpful to combine these into groupings? Groupings like punizione civile, punizione ecclesiastico, guerra, for example. Would that add unneccesary complexity? Or would it be best to leave these forms of force in their original wordings as we did with the person: “name” attributes, and give up trying to classify them.

I imagine a sort of grim catalogue of violence, and index of evils that could be drawn from this encoding. Villani has his spicy side too. Any suggestions welcome.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

2 Comments »

Comment by roberto
2005-11-13 16:11:14

I would not combine all these terms into different groupings, at least for the moment. The division into sub-groups could be done according to several different criteria: Dante himself, in the Inferno, distinguishes violence against the others, against oneself (suicide), against one’s belongings, against God etc. But if it is not yet clear to you which type of sub-division is the most appropriate for Villani, then it is better to wait. Concerning torture, I read (long ago) the book by George Riley Scott, “A History of Torture”, and I remember the author had some kind of classification for different types of torture. Maybe you could take a look at that book, but - I repeat - I think it is still to early to think about a sub-division.

 
Comment by mike
2005-11-17 09:02:58

Although this may be a superfluous comment, I’d like to mention that getting too specific in encoding descriptions could prove somewhat less than useful. I would strongly agree with Roberto that it’s wiser to wait on the invention of subdivisions. Indeed, after the entire text is encoded, it will be far easier to take decisions on this question, keeping in mind, however, the purpose that the descriptions would serve in the big picture. It’s tempting - but often not ultimately very useful - to describe/encode more than what is necessary.

 
Name (required)


E-mail (required - never shown publicly)


URI


Subscribe to comments via email

Your Comment
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.
Comments are moderated. Please submit only once.