Oaks tear up the storm floor Nothing left to warn The poisoned rat has poisoned the owl The striped air of the state is choked With pointed salty star materials They've cut the tips off dollar bills Now chipped stars everywhere seems like Death planes with Daisy Chains Bomb planes with cute little names Swordfish stab the water's skin The sea has no plot
Earlier thinkers thought of air As a mist not a context With each bomb the part That was narrow shrinks. Our god passes by briefly From another existence With his pretty floating rib The one they call the twelfth The webbed arch of caravans Frames the desert horror The owl's eyes follow them on this side of the pale |
GREEN PLANTS AND A BAMBOO FLUTE One night in a vision Your future car was buried Today they drive the buried car Turn like a three-part song Electricity wants not to be anymore Or to be darktricity The brain is an atmosphere of rooms A situation without a future Where us presides over an it The doom's-whim-bride's-trace fog Doubles as a shroud
If the flute cannot be found Its breath is in you Making an @ sign of sex or grain What was it thinking of The catkins look so like grenades Maybe the particle spirits Will spin in the at of each address Knock the wheel of fate from its orbit Race to a curled up Solomon's sleep in the clock's Ring moist with air
Brenda Hillman’s “Green Pants & Bamboo Flute” appeared in an online anti-war anthology before it was published in her book Pieces of Air in the Epic. Its most ostensible theme is the anguishing omnipresence in Hillman's consciousness of the American war in Iraq. But Hillman’s unique poetic architectures are integral to her poems, and often (as in the title sequences of Cascadia and Loose Sugar) they are very elaborate. Here, the title “Green Pants & Bamboo Flute” immediately sets into relation two elements (pants and flute), and almost every subsequent line does the same (not always as twin nouns). The notable exceptions are where Hillman’s hallmark, quirky semantic shifts, often launched by sequential modifiers—“pointed salty star materials,” “cute little names,” or “his pretty floating rib”—quicken the syntactical movement and slide the register upward. The poem’s stanzas themselves are coupled, but the two stanzaic pairs map out a relationship that is perhaps even more temporal than textual. To wit, the upper left stanza unfolds in PRESENT tense. The upper right stanza overlays references to “Today” and “Now” with specific allusions to the FUTURE. Other words in the stanza, want and bride for instance, are also future-oriented. The lower left stanza invokes with its first word, “Earlier,” its reference to a myth of origin, and its image of a “webbed arch of caravans” (which calls to mind U.S. calvary) the PAST. But if we read into the construction of the poem a loose indication of Present, Future, and Past in three stanzas, how do we consider the fourth stanza, the shortest one? That’s precisely where “fate” and the “clock’s/ Ring” mete out the time, joining it “in the @ of each address” to its events. Read this way, the poem is a secret history of eternal recurrence. (And it is disturbing, considering the recurring allusions to violence and war). Still, the full impact of Hillman’s poems arise from the relationship between larger structural patterns and smaller, more spidery ones. For instance, we quickly find that each stanza weaves together natural, technological, and philo-theosophical terms. And each stanza bares a black hourglass: poison, death planes, darktricity, doom, shroud, desert horror, grenades, etc. The spin of material, tone, and reference is not unlike “the spin in the @ of each address”. But Hillman’s lexicon is loaded here. On the one hand, address locates each reader, each atrocity, each thing. But at the same time, address designates the speaking voice of “particle spirits,” that resident chorus in Hillman’s expressively animistic universe who so often address the reader. By reinterpreting objectivity as intersubjectivity, hierarchy as holism, Hillman’s poems unhinge us. The tonal register in her recent poems is often a harmonic of keening, outrage, and palpable exuberance. The poems inspire an attentive listening, as though all the reader's cells were ears. |
|