the recovered memory project

 


 

The Archive > Criteria for Inclusion

1. Cases must be verifiable. To be included on this list, cases must be identified with sufficient specificity to facilitate independent examination by others. Proper names are favored, and cases without proper names must nevertheless be verifiable. The only cases involving pseudonyms are those so treated by a court, and those cases can be located and reviewed (although obtaining access to all of the records would require judicial approval). There is at least one citation for each case on this list, and eventually there will be full-text hyperlinks to various supporting documents.

2. Cases Must Include Strong Corroborative Evidence. To be included on this list, the recovered memory memory at issue must be corroborated by at least one of the following sources:
a. confession, guilty plea, or self-incriminatory statement
b. testimony from other victims (or from an eyewitness to the abuse), or corroborative documentary evidence that is vitally relevant to the charges at issue
c. corroboration of significant circumstantial evidence

note: almost cases in the Archive have more than one form of corroborative evidence. With the exception of a few cases set within a family, the multiple victim cases all have corroboration from more than one additional victim. The cases based on circumstantial corroboration all include favorable judicial decisions on the facts as well.

back to top

 

Page last updated
July, 2005

Project Director
Professor Ross E. Cheit
Taubman Center for Public Policy & American Institutions
at Brown University
67 George Street
Box 1977
Brown University
Providence, RI 02912
Tel: 401-863-2201
Fax: 401-863-2452

Brown University


© Ross E. Cheit 1997-2005. All rights reserved.