publications @ brown university library

 publications @ http://www.brown.edu/Facilities/University_Library

  josiah | other catalogs | e-resources | forms | services | a to z | search library web | library home | brown home   

high-graphics version   

BiblioFile

LIBRARY ISSUES: FALL 2000

As the academic year 2000/2001 progresses, the Library is in the midst of many changes related to facilities and services. For example, this issue of BiblioFile offers you an overview of improvements to Library spaces: the renovation of the Rockefeller Library Circulation area and the creation of a multimedia laboratory in the Sciences Library. One of our most exciting initiatives is the Virtual Catalog/Direct Distance Borrowing project, which Brown is developing with the other members of the Boston Library Consortium (BLC). As Bart Hollingsworth writes, this new catalog, which will become available in pilot mode this year, will allow you to search the holdings of BLC member libraries in one large database and to request a book from another library with the click of a mouse. When complete (within the next 18 months), the BLC Virtual Catalog will put at your fingertips the holdings of a 25-million-volume "virtual library."

Although we work hard every day to improve collections and services, we must also acknowledge that the last decade been especially challenging for the Library, and that collection building has been affected accordingly. In a recent report prepared for the faculty, I cited Association of Research Libraries (ARL) statistics that showed serials costs in ARL institutions rising 207% since 1986, while monograph costs increased by 65%. Despite the efforts of libraries to maintain their collections Ð serials expenditures rose 170% during the same time period--collectively, ARL members are today purchasing 6% fewer serial titles and 26% fewer monographs. Since 1990, the Brown University Libraryâs acquisitions budget, counting one-time allocations from the President or Provost, has increased annually by an average of 5.5%. Coupled with the obvious shortfall between budget increases and actual costs was the growing demand for resources in digital form, and the need to support new academic programs for which no new base budget funding had been provided.
Beset on many fronts, the Library employed a number of strategies to stretch available dollars further. Peripheral or low-use journal titles were cancelled in an effort to protect the monograph budget, to transfer freed-up funds to electronic resources, and to subsidize document delivery and Interlibrary Loan services. Consortial agreements created effective partnerships, both for the licensing of databases and for access to other library collections. Despite the limitations of tight budgets, competing priorities, and high prices, in the Î90âs, the Library contrived to add critical titles to the collection, build an impressive array of scholarly materials in digital form, and acquire some significant special collections.

As we enter the 21st century, however, we know that our collections require strengthening in several key areas. Our collection of journals, never substantial in ARL terms, has deteriorated and requires rebuilding to meet the needs of a University/College. Additional funds must be secured not only to meet the needs of new academic programs, but also to address emerging deficiencies in our historically strong collections, for which purchasing in the Î90âs was inevitably affected. Finally, we must secure base budget funding for "digital content," which represents an important, and steadily growing, means for scholarly communication.

We are very much encouraged by the support the Library has received this year from the faculty, from Provost Kathryn T. Spoehr, and from Interim President Sheila Blumstein. This yearâs increase in the acquisitions budget exceeds 8%, the largest the Library has received in some years. Current University financial planning identifies both the Library and CIS as areas of high priority, and both departments have submitted "case statements" to the Provost identifying the dollars needed to address our most critical funding needs. We hope that in the next several years the Library will be more appropriately funded to support the needs of the University/College, through priority allocation of institution funds, as well as from increased fundraising.

-Merrily E. Taylor, Joukowsky Family University Librarian

Return to Publications Page

Return to Bibliofile 35

Comments to: Brown University Library Web Team
Last Updated: Thursday, 12-Jul-2001 14:37:28 EDT
© 2000, Brown University Library. All rights reserved.

You are the 454th visitor since October 29, 2000.