Trained botanists and amateurs alike have regarded the cacti with awe
for centuries. The copious production of spines, lack of leaves, bizarre
architecture and impressive ability to persist in the harshest
environments on Earth are all traits that have entitled this lineage to
be named a true wonder of the plant world.
Pereskia, a (now likely
paraphyletic) lineage of relatively non-succulent, leafy trees and
shrubs, has long been recognized as the evolutionary link between
leafless cacti and other, "normal" plants. However, it is now evident
that Cactaceae is only one of many highly specialized plant lineages
emerging from what was once the Portulacaceae. Within what is currently
referred to as the Portulacineae (sensu Nyffeler 2007) there has been
the evolution of the diminuitive, leaf succulent Anacampseroteae in
South Africa, as well as the diversification of the pachycaulescent
Didiereaceae, a lineage spanning Africa and Madagascar, and that like
Cactaceae, evolved stem succulence, but maintained their leaves as the
primary sites of photosynthesis. This new phylogenetic picture raises
some interesting questions. What did the ancestor of these bizarre
groups of plants look like, where did it live, and how did it function?
What do the cacti functionally have in common with Didiereaceae and
Anacampserotae, and how do they differ? Are there particular ecological
or anatomical traits that these specialized lineages share with the more
"typical" herbaceous Portulaca-type plant? Can we infer the ecological
conditions that may have triggered such dramatic morphological
innovation in these lineages, and were they similar in each case? Our
lab is involved in ongoing work on the phylogenetics and
ecological/functional characterization of this enigmatic group of
plants, in close collaboration with
Reto Nyffeler.
Biogeography and evolution of C4 grasses
"C4 photosynthesis" refers to a suite of biochemical and anatomical
traits that increase photosynthetic efficiency in high light and high
temperature environments. The most prominent C4 plants are C4 grasses,
which account for up to ~25% of global terrestrial primary production
and include important crop and weed plants and potential biofuels such
as maize, sugarcane, sorghum, and switchgrass. In the wild, C4 grasses
dominate tropical and subtropical grasslands and the herbaceous
understory of savannas, but are conspicuously absent from the world's
cooler regions. Mechanisms directly attributable to the C4 pathway have
been invoked to explain global C4 grass distribution, such as higher
quantum yields at higher leaf temperatures compared to species with the
more common "C3" pathway. However, it is also true that C4
photosynthesis evolved exclusively in grass lineages of tropical origin,
suggesting that C4 grasses may instead be adapted to warm conditions due
to other traits they inherited from their non-C4 ancestors. This
conundrum has been acknowledged for decades, but never explicitly
investigated. We are testing the role of photosynthetic pathway
variation in the ecological sorting of grasses, using georeferenced
specimens of the Hawaiian grass flora and phylogenetic comparative
methods. We are also interested in dating the origins of C4
photosynthesis in grasses, and in using phylogeny and niche modeling to
build better distribution models of particular grass clades around the
globe. In close collaboration with
Chris Still, at UCSB.

a lowland plant community dominated
by C4 grasses, Volcanoes National Park, Hawaii

Chris Still measuring photosynthesis
in
Eragrostis grandis, a C4 grass endemic to the Hawaiian Islands

Lucy and Erika carefully id grasses, Volcanoes National Park, Hawaii
The role of the environment in shaping leaf evolution is undoubtedly
important, and decades of comparative ecological work have delineated
several general predictions about correlations between leaf form and
habitat. In hot, arid, and high light environments, for example, it is
common to find plants with smaller, thicker leaves, often with trichomes
or other cuticular appendages, and low stomatal pore areas. We infer
ecological trends such as this to be adaptive; in other words, we infer
that a hot, sunny environment provides a strong selective force to
evolve a small, thick leaf. On the other hand, a great
diversity of leaf forms can be found living alongside the
"quintessential leaf" in any given environment, suggesting that many
species successfully survive and reproduce there without evolving the
traits assumed to be optimal. In addition, evolutionary response to
external selection pressures is complicated by the fact that leaves are
developmentally and functionally integrated parts of the whole plant.
Recent advances in phylogenetic comparative tools provide an
alternative, improved approach to address the evolution of leaf form and function. We
are reconstructing the history of leaf evolution in
Viburnum
(Adoxaceae), a clade of ~140 species of trees and shrubs with a wide
geographical distribution.
Viburnum is perfectly suited to this problem
as we have a solid understanding of evolutionary relationships within
the group, and
Viburnum species exhibit a remarkable diversity of many
"key" leaf traits. In collaboration with
Michael Donoghue (Yale), we are
addressing the following questions:
1. Are major habitat/climate shifts driving evolutionary divergences in leaf form?
2. Does the hydraulic capacity of stems and leaves evolve as a unit, and
is this hydraulic pathway linked to leaf carbon assimilation rate?
3. How do changes in leaf form affect these key functional traits?
4. Are traits pertaining to hydraulic capacity and traits pertaining to drought
tolerance evolving independently? Do some leaf traits exhibit
greater evolutionary lability than others?
5. How are evolutionary changes in leaf form integrated with other, often
overlooked organismal-level traits, such as shifts in branching
architecture and/or leafing and flowering phenology?