Cleanscape Data

APPENDIX B: Soil Lead Testing Results for CleanScape Lots

Home Keystone Chapter Data Maps

 

ID

Job #

Plat

Lot

Street

Pb (wt%)

Std. Err

Pb (ppm)

 

R1_1

103

48

864

138-140 Reynolds Ave

0.057

0.003

570

St. Dev

R1_2

111

 

 

 

0.042

0.002

420

402

R1_3

107

 

 

 

0.056

0.003

560

Average

R1_4

150

 

 

 

0.08

0.004

800

621

R1_5

109

 

 

 

0.037

0.002

370

 

R1_6

173

 

 

 

0.038

0.002

380

 

R1_7

146

 

 

 

0.047

0.002

470

 

R1_8

139

 

 

 

0.163

0.007

1630

 

R1_6

143

 

 

 

0.039

0.002

390

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A1

187

54

648

144 Pavilion St

0.055

0.003

550

 

A2

119

 

 

 

0.06

0.003

600

St. Dev

A3

118

 

 

 

0.155

0.007

1550

356

A4

117

 

 

 

0.06

0.003

600

Average

A5

116

 

 

 

0.057

0.003

570

606

A6

61

 

 

 

0.049

0.002

490

 

A7

110

 

 

 

0.082

0.004

820

 

A8

152

 

 

 

0.031

0.002

310

 

A9

71

 

 

 

0.024

0.001

240

 

*A8

202

 

 

 

0.031

0.002

310

 

*A4

204

 

 

 

0.063

0.003

630

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B1

157

54

565

143 Pavilion Street

0.127

0.006

1270

 

B2

163

 

 

 

0.0169

0.0009

169

St. Dev

B3

115

 

 

 

0.019

0.001

190

391

B4

114

 

 

 

0.041

0.002

410

Average

B5

174

 

 

 

0.037

0.002

370

412

B6

181

 

 

 

0.03

0.002

300

 

*B2

199

 

 

 

0.0173

0.0009

173

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H1

168

45

32

7 Harvard Avenue

0.28

0.01

2800

 

H2

171

 

 

 

0.37

0.01

3700

St. Dev

H3

186

 

 

 

0.227

0.009

2270

19024

H4

70

 

 

 

0.106

0.005

1060

Average

H5

100

 

 

 

6.5

0.07

65000

7697

H6

154

 

 

 

0.075

0.004

750

 

H7

160

 

 

 

0.26

0.01

2600

 

H8

164

 

 

 

0.185

0.008

1850

 

H9

175

 

 

 

0.143

0.006

1430

 

*H5

142

 

 

 

0.137

0.006

1370

 

*H8

200

 

 

 

0.184

0.008

1840

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C1

196

48

385

65 Ocean Street

0.087

0.004

870

 

C2

193

 

 

 

0.172

0.007

1720

St. Dev

C3

162

 

 

 

0.12

0.005

1200

438

C4

104

 

 

 

0.059

0.003

590

Average

C5

102

 

 

 

0.082

0.004

820

1040

 

ID

Job #

Plat

Lot

Street

Pb (wt%)

Std. Err

Pb (ppm)

 

L1

126

23

58

27 Linden Street

0.162

0.007

1620

 

L2

125

 

 

 

0.134

0.006

1340

St. Dev.

L3

124

 

 

 

0.36

0.01

3600

3463

L4

123

 

 

 

0.097

0.005

970

Average

L5

123

 

 

 

0.137

0.006

1370

2692

L6

121

 

 

 

0.12

0.005

1200

 

L7

122

 

 

 

1.23

0.03

12300

 

L8

120

 

 

 

0.094

0.004

940

 

L9

112

 

 

 

0.148

0.007

1480

 

L10

113

 

 

 

0.21

0.009

2100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

J2_1

133

46

506

10-12 Janes Street

0.166

0.007

1660

 

J2_2

128

 

 

 

0.108

0.005

1080

St. Dev.

J2_3

129

 

 

 

0.047

0.002

470

596

J2_4

132

 

 

 

0.072

0.004

720

Average

J2_5

136

 

 

 

0.211

0.009

2110

1029

J2_5B

137

 

 

 

0.033

0.002

330

 

J2_6

127

 

 

 

0.092

0.004

920

 

J2_7

134

 

 

 

0.094

0.004

940

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

R2_1

138

 

 

146-148 Reynolds Street

0.069

0.003

690

 

R2_2

144

 

 

 

0.051

0.003

510

St. Dev.

R2_3

140

 

 

 

0.021

0.001

210

380

R2_4

63

 

 

 

0.044

0.002

440

Average

R2_5

67

 

 

 

0.059

0.003

590

561

R2_6

64

 

 

 

0.0159

0.0009

159

 

R2_7

65

 

 

 

0.028

0.001

280

 

R2_8

131

 

 

 

0.132

0.006

1320

 

R2_9

63

 

 

 

0.033

0.002

330

 

R2_10

130

 

 

 

0.108

0.005

1080

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

J1_1

135

 

29

16 Janes Street

0.38

0.01

3800

 

J1_2

183

 

 

 

0.057

0.003

570

St. Dev

J1_3

151

 

 

 

0.134

0.006

1340

862

J1_4

149

 

 

 

0.226

0.009

2260

Average

J1_5

195

 

 

 

0.149

0.007

1490

1838

J1_6

194

 

 

 

0.136

0.006

1360

 

J1_7

167

 

 

 

0.249

0.01

2490

 

J1_8

165

 

 

 

0.132

0.006

1320

 

J1_9

101

 

 

 

0.203

0.008

2030

 

*J1_4

201

 

 

 

0.226

0.009

2260

 

*J1_7

198

 

 

 

0.13

0.006

1300

 

 

ID

Job #

Plat

Lot

Street

Pb (wt%)

Std. Err

Pb (ppm)

 

H5_1

189

 

 

30 Harvard Avenue

0.138

0.006

1380

 

H5_2

197

 

 

 

0.079

0.004

790

St. Dev.

H5_3

69

 

 

 

0.121

0.006

1210

2708

H5_5

153

 

 

 

0.096

0.005

960

Average

H5_6

67

 

 

 

0.24

0.01

2400

2187

H5_7

182

 

 

 

0.15

0.007

1500

 

H5_8

108

 

 

 

0.105

0.005

1050

 

H5_9

156

 

 

 

0.109

0.005

1090

 

*H5_8

148

 

 

 

0.93

0.02

9300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H4_1

72

 

 

42, 44-40 Harvard Avenue

0.228

0.009

2280

 

H4_2

188

 

 

 

0.117

0.005

1170

St. Dev.

H4_3

177

 

 

 

0.098

0.005

980

1912

H4_4

159

 

 

 

0.231

0.009

2310

Average

H4_5

184

 

 

 

0.061

0.003

610

2331

H4_6

145

 

 

 

0.082

0.004

820

 

H4_7

178

 

 

 

0.46

0.02

4600

 

H4_8

166

 

 

 

0.3

0.01

3000

 

H4_9

179

 

 

 

0.184

0.008

1840

 

H4_10

191

 

 

 

0.69

0.02

6900

 

H4_11

155

 

 

 

0.113

0.005

1130

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H3_1

106

45

217

50 Harvard Avenue

0.138

0.006

1380

 

H3_2

176

 

 

 

0.106

0.005

1060

St. Dev

H3_3

169

 

 

 

0.227

0.009

2270

494

H3_4

180

 

 

 

0.138

0.006

1380

Average

H3_5

161

 

 

 

0.172

0.007

1720

1578

H3_6

190

 

 

 

0.164

0.007

1640

 

H3_7

68

 

 

 

0.074

0.004

740

 

H3_8

172

 

 

 

0.187

0.008

1870

 

H3_9

105

 

 

 

0.214

0.009

2140

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S2

203

 

 

standards

0.182

0.008

1820

 

S2

147

 

 

standards

0.186

0.008

1860

St. Dev

S2

170

 

 

standards

0.184

0.008

1840

18

S1

192

 

 

standards

0.185

0.008

1850

Average

S1

185

 

 

standards

0.182

0.008

1820

1835

S1

141

 

 

standards

0.182

0.008

1820

 

 

 

Methodology

A total of thirteen vacant lots were sampled in two days. Each lot was measured and marked with an X-transect. Surface soil samples were scooped into plastic baggies every 10 – 20 feet (the distance between each sample and the number of samples taken varied according to the size of the lot) along the transect. Visual assessments of the lots were noted in the charts drawn for each lot (litter, debris, surrounding houses, etc). Contiguous lots, 42 Harvard Avenue and 44-40 Harvard Avenue, were sampled with one large transect that covered both lots. I was unable to test certain lots because of the following: used as off street parking so that parked cars prohibited access to soil, concrete slabs or other large debris limited access, many of the 21 original lots had a fresh layer of top soil so that the presence of contamination was unlikely, one lot was not tested because there was a fight breaking out on it so for safety’s sake I avoided testing it that day.

Once all of the samples were collected, I air dried each sample for 24 hours. After air-drying, I sieved each sample with a 2mm sieve and oven dried them for another 24 hours. I then pulverized the samples and ground them together with 15% binder (copolymer wax) and 85% sample by weight so that each sample was approximately 5 grams. The samples were then pressed into press powdered pellets. The samples were analyzed using a Philips Sequential X-Ray Fluorescent spectrometer and the data was reduced using Uniquant 2.24.

The samples were tested for heavy metals, specifically lead, copper, cadmium, chromium and arsenic. According the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management’s standards for copper, cadmium, and chromium, my soil samples did not show any significant levels of any of these metals. The standard level of arsenic (1.7 ppm) was not detectable using the Uniquant system (not sensitive enough to pick up these smaller amounts) thus I was unable to determine the presence of arsenic in the soil samples. Three standard samples of Montana Soil (SRM2711) were split into six samples and tested. The published value for lead for this soil is 1162 ppm. The mean and standard deviations of the standards can be compared to the published amount to get an idea of the precision of my measurements. Also, one can compare the values between all the standard samples to get a sense of the accuracy of the measurement for the same sample. Certain soil samples were run twice (indicated with an asterisk in Table) and again one can get a sense of the accuracy by comparing the results of two runs of the same sample.

 

by Ana Baptista

Back to Top