Livable Providence 2000

An Urban Environmental Conference

URBAN RIVERS AND PONDS
 
 

SUMMARY

The group identified Providence's urban rivers and ponds as sites for recreational use and aesthetic appeal. While session participants are aware of a number of ongoing activities addressing the quality of Providence's urban rivers and ponds, they believe that more efforts are needed and that those efforts should concentrate on improving water quality. Governing bodies were encouraged to identify and clean up contaminated sites alongside rivers and ponds. Additionally, the group expressed a need for enhanced public education efforts about both the problems and potential benefits of rivers and ponds as well as a desire for more support for community-based organizations.
 


THE DISCUSSION ...

Approximately 15 individuals participated in this session. How are Rivers and Ponds used ... The moderator began this discussion with a query about how rivers and ponds are used by participants and residents. All of the responses, with the exception of the recently inaugurated ferry service, related to recreational or aesthetic uses. The responses are:
 
  • Canoeing
  • Field trips
  • Kayaking
  • Sitting by rivers
  • Walks
  • Waterfire
  • Community sailing
  • Fish watching
  • Bird watching
  • Pawtucket to Providence Ferry
  • "Seen people fishing" (No one said they fished)
  • Youth volunteer cleanups 
  • Community Boat Center
  • Merino Park
  • Youth recreation programs
  • What's going on ... One person said he felt that Narragansett Bay should be included in this discussion as any issue relating to rivers and ponds is inherently related to the Bay, a sentiment that drew agreement from other session participants. Nonetheless, participants offered a long list of projects that address the water quality of rivers and ponds in Providence and Rhode Island.
     
  • Proposed Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Project
  • Friends of the Moshassuck conduct tree plantings
  • State/city project to build four docks to provide access
  • Woonasquatucket River Greenway project
  • Work on brownfields, including non-point source reductions
  • Establishing parks and the Buttonhole Golf Course
  • American Heritage River designation
  • Groundwater Trust is testing, sampling and organizing around Mashapaug Pond
  • River Reconnaissance is identifying pipes and sampling water
  • City of Providence received EPA grant to plan riparian buffers
  • Cleanup efforts on the Woonasquatucket, Moshassuck, Seekonk and Providence Rivers
  • Urban Rivers Team
  • One participant, an employee of Providence's Parks and Recreation Department, explained the relationship between Mashapaug Pond and the ponds in Roger Williams Park. He said Mashapaug Pond receives storm-water runoff from several parking lots and there is an industrial legacy in the area. The result, he said, is that Mashapaug Pond is virtually ignored as a recreational resource. The Roger Williams Park ponds receive inflow via a drainage pipe from Mashapaug Pond as well as from surrounding urban areas.

    The 102 acres of ponds and lakes in the park have been used for over 100 years for canoeing and row boating. The manmade lakes, designed in the 1870's, are shallow and the combination of nutrients flowing in through the drainage system and summer heat leads to eutrophication (evidenced by high amounts of algae in the summer).

    "We are still thinking about how to deal with the nutrients coming into the park," he said. "We know beyond a doubt we have a nutrient problem." Specifically, he mentioned the presence of low levels of dissolved oxygen and high fecal coliform counts.

    On another front, the Woonasquatucket River Greenway Project is working to promote multiple uses of the river corridor, according to another participant. That effort includes testing for dioxins, PCBs and bacteria. The group has also launched an educational campaign. "We are using the river as a catalyst for urban revitalization," this person said. The effort to make the river more visible to the public is cosponsored by the city of Providence, the Providence Plan, the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM), the Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) and the EPA.

    One person noted that there was not much activity geared toward the West River. This person said he is aware of a few groups that would like to do some work on the river, and this was a possible area for creation of community-based efforts.

    The group also heard of EPA and RIDOH efforts to test water quality at Narragansett Bay beaches. "We know it is not safe in wet weather conditions," a participant told the session. "This (information) is going into the web-page (RIDOH's) so people will know if there are health issues to swimming."


    What should occur ...

    The missing element is clean water, one person said to begin this discussion. "We're all moving ahead on different levels trying to get people to canoe, ride and someday fish on the water and we've just spent millions of dollars to try to make at least the edges of downtown rivers look beautiful," he said. "I feel very unsure as I see 13-year-old kids sailing off India Point what the quality of that water is after a wet weather event. We are inviting people to come down and enjoy this urban renaissance and yet the main attraction after a storm is not very renaissance-like at all."

    This person continued, "The number one priority is to get city residents and the state active in dealing with this CSO (Combined sewer overflow) problem. I see a tremendous conflict happening down the road when the cost of dealing with the CSO gets allocated to users of the Narragansett Bay Commission (NBC) system and everybody else. The equity of poor neighborhoods paying for cleaner water is going to be a big issue. The whole NBC effort needs to be the number one thing talked about over the next five years."

    One person felt, "public education is an issue that needs to be addressed." In particular, this person felt that information about water borne hazards that potentially threaten public health is not adequately shared with the community. She felt that addressing those issues through an education campaign would increase community involvement in addressing the issue. Another participant felt signs should be posted at water access points throughout the city to inform users about the safety of various activities (e.g., fishing, swimming).

    Another suggestion related to the perceived need for information and education included a suggestion to provide homeowners with an informational pamphlet explaining the outcomes of various disposal and resource use activities.

    Group members suggested actions that government should take, including the establishment of a consistent policy between both city and state governments in regard to future development. A need to reclaim waterway buffers was expressed, as was a suggestion to acquire more reservoirs to feed into the water system. One person said that the city and state should provide more resources to community-based organizations.

    The River Reconnaissance efforts were lauded by group members who felt they should be expanded to include all rivers in order to quantify both point and non-point sources of pollution.

    One participant suggested that allowing on-street parking would reduce non-point sources of pollution as homeowners would remove asphalt that covers their yards, increasing the amount of permeable surface area in the city as a result. Another participant suggested that the city should develop a policy that both encourages and controls permeable ground surface.

    There is a continuing need to identify and fund the cleanup of contaminated sites along rivers, and that effort should be extended beyond brownfield sites, one person said.
     
     

    THE TOP ISSUES ...
    1. Public education about urban rivers and ponds should be a priority. (19 votes)
    2. Identify and fund cleanups of contaminated sites at urban rivers and ponds. (19 votes)
    3. Conduct river reconnaissance on all urban rivers to identify non-combined sewer overflow sources of pollution. (14 votes)
    4. Provide more resources to community-based organizations to conduct public outreach and education. (13 votes)
    5. Focus on clean water (improving the quality of the water) in urban rivers and ponds. (13 votes)
    6. City should create a policy to create permeable areas to reduce runoff. (10 votes)
    7. Get city residents and the state actively involved in CSO efforts and the distribution of costs to do it. (9 votes)
    8. Provide more on-street parking. (9 votes)
    9. Start reclaiming buffer along all urban rivers and ponds (include taking up paved/impermeable surfaces, and walking paths). (9 votes)
    10. Need consistent city and state policy on buffer zones along urban rivers and ponds. (8 votes)
    11. Identify alternative ideas for CSO project. (8 votes)
    12. Recognize the Bay as a valuable urban resource as part of rivers and ponds. (5 votes)
    13. Increase public access to the waterfront along urban rivers and ponds. (4 votes)
    14. Acquire more reservoir and watershed areas. (4 votes)
    15. Develop a cost estimate for examining expansion of separated CSO system. (4 votes)