The
paper takes a short look at the much discussed
dismissal of the author in hypertext collaborative
writing and discusses the role of authorship in
three German collaborative writing projects. The
results are:
- Collaboration
sometimes works like collaboration with the
'enemy.' The pleasure of some collaborative
writing projects therefore derives not so much
from the story itself as from what the text
reveals about its authors.
- The pleasure of
some collaborative writing project lies in the
setting more than in the contributed texts. What
fails as Netliterature may get a second chance
as Netart.
- If the program
of a collaborative writing project automatically
and randomly creates the links and develops the
structure of the whole, it takes over the
collaboration between authors and their
texts.
The conclusion is:
As the text itself becomes more and more part of a
technical setting, and as the program moves more
and more into the center, the project of
collaborative writing gradually dismisses the
reader. To a user who accidentally stops by and
starts to read, the text itself doesn't say all
that much. She has to become a writer, she has to
join the authors, including their discussion group,
in order to understand what's going on and to enjoy
the project. One has to take part in this group,
one has to read this 'text' to enjoy the other,
'official' text. Quality of text, in the way
critics use to approach this issue, doesn't matter
any more. What matters is the event of which one is
part of. Someone who is not in the game might not
enjoy watching it, unless he or she approaches for
other reasons like researching the dynamic of the
group, the 'social aesthetics' behind the text
itself.
full
paper
(given
at conference
p0es1s
- poetics of digital
text
)