|
I. Aesthetically
speaking, digital poetry will not gain so much by
operating within its very specific media, as by
operating with or against said media.
II. Nothing radically new occurs with digital
poetry.
III. Digital poetry does not improve on, redeem or
translate (post)modern ways of writing.
IV. Digital poetry's place within the net of
varying literary forms is to be found in the
program of literary experiment.
V. Digital poetry presents and exemplifies the use
of languages, or codes, in symbol processing
computers and in digital networks.
VI. Digital poetry broadens the spectrum in which
time and space may be poetically formed.
VII. Digital poetry illustrates and externalises
technology, including technologies of self.
VIII. Digital poetry may prompt the discussion on
poetics.
full
paper
(Paper given
at conference  p0es1s
- poetics of digital text
)
|