|
|
www.dichtung-digital.org/2003/3-glazier.htm
Poetics
of Dynamic Text
by Loss
Pequeño Glazier
|
Dynamic
texts offer new possibilities for reading and new
challenges in how we approach the reading object,
forcing the final object away from the idea of a
fixed form on a fixed surface. In order to "read"
such an object, one must look deeper, into the code
itself, and one must consider the various
ramifications inherent in a code-based work.
Ultimately, one must explore the edge where
language apparatuses engage
|
|
|
|
|
The
apparent
present.
(Rae Armantrout, "Native",
Made To Seem 30)
Of course, one might say
that dynamic text, or text that is different on each
reading, is a mere dramatization of the unarguable fact that
even Wuthering Heights is different each time you
read it, depending on the characteristics of the last
Heathcliff or Catherine in your own personal life and
whether you are reading it on vacation in Yorkshire or in
the depths of the Yucatan jungle. Each reading of such a
novel is different, of course, because differences in
context, setting, and personal circumstances foster
different interpretations, cause different words, images,
etc. to jump out.
However, dynamic text, text
that is physically different each time you encounter
it, offers interesting possibilities.
It forces the literary
work away from the idea of a final form presented on a
fixed surface "of record". This is why conventional
link-node hypertext offers little in the way of
innovation and why, when link-node hypertext declares
itself to represent new technology, it is actually quite
a heinous misrepresentation.
When
the artistic work is forced away from fixed form, one
must look deeper for a sense of meaning. This means
looking to the concept, mechanism, or operation that
underlies the work, querying the core stability
underlying the work, that which remains constant beneath
its litigious, shifting illusion of the surface. One must
find what is solid beneath the transitory -- much like
meditation!
- This also means
literally looking deeper -- to the code. A work of
programmed literature, and here I would emphasize works
that are hand coded as opposed to interface assembled,
present a complex of writing, that is, textuality
superimposed on textuality. In this environment, one move
can affect elements on other planes of activity. As in
3-D chess, one must think on several levels before making
a mark!
Programmability
may be a defining characteristic of what might really be
called New Media writing. That is, not writing that has
been remediated to sit on the screen like a colorized
stuffed pheasant on the mantelpiece, but writing that
engages a complex of language (im)possibilities. Most
importantly, the reader should approach the work keenly
aware of the writing within writing that makes such a
work happen. Indeed, thinking again of Norman White's
robotic artworks and White's tendency to use
semi-transparent cases in their construction, one should
think of looking at the surface while bearing in mind the
"writing" beneath. It is useful to approach
programmatological works with such a mindset.
An
example of this might be in processes that engage writing
code structures, displaying and sounding them, then
altering the code to alter their soundings. Such an
interplay offers interesting new ways to conceive of a
poetics of coding. This is reminiscent of an interview
with a Hispanic writer I heard, where he mentioned
writing a piece in English then translating to Spanish
then revising to translate back to English. It was a way
of using two language processes to sound against each
other to build un objeto of interlinguistic
arte.
The
dynamic qualities of such works are dependent on specific
and varying notions of seed and on supporting
randomization and selection algorithms. These are issues
in the work also worthy of attention and debate.

Detail from
"Cog"
by Loss Pequeño Glazier
"Dyanmic" is not here meant
to simply mean text that moves. Neither is it meant to mean
text that has merely has computational origins. The object
that is at the center of this inquiry is one that does not
just sit there (or sit there and move). Rather a poetics of
dynamic text seeks to engage that delicate edge where
language appartuses meet, slip, and engage, to further the
possibilities of the poetic text.
|
|