Professor: Lysaght Course format: Lecture Number of respondents: 31 Total Enrollment: 62

Class Composition Froshs: 16 Sophs: 10 Jrs: 20 Srs: 16 Concs: 10 Non-Concs: 11 Don't Know: 8	Instructor Average: 1.95 Course Average: 2.05

The course "Biotechnology in Medicine" examines the historical and recent advances in the field of medical technology. Designed primarily for undergraduates, it gives a broad overview of the issues pertaining to the use, ethics, and economics of the biotechnology in today's society. There are no prerequisites for the course except for an interest in the subject matter.

This course was team-taught by Professors Galletti and Lysaght. In addition, other guest speakers with special expertise also taught frequently. The bulk of the teaching was done by the two head professors, who were each received in different ways. Galletti was well-liked in general. The only major criticism was that he was often difficult to understand, which made following the lectures tough. Lysaght, on the other hand, was praised for his enthusiasm and clarity. Students found him both entertaining and engaging. They also praised both professors for being very knowledgeable.

The class was evaluated in several manners. First, five quizzes were given throughout the semester. These were criticized for either being too general at times or too specific at other times. In addition, two essays were assigned; each was roughly three pages in length. One final five to seven page paper was also due. Students found the workload for this course to be quite manageable, spending as little as two to four hours a week.

While students got a lot out of this course, they had several minor complaints. Not only was new material introduced during the Reading Period, but a quiz was also given. Furthermore, the class was responsible for so much information that they often did not have time to see the big picture. Most complained that they spent a great deal of time memorizing details and statistics. Their solution was to cut down the amount of unnecessary reading and open the class to more discussion. While the material was enjoyable, the class did not facilitate open discussion nor independent thought.

Even with these complaints, though, most reviews readily recommended this course for future students. They cited that it was especially appropriate for pre-meds, as it touched upon issues relevant to the field of medicine but often not covered in other courses.

View BI/0017 in the Brown Online Course Announcement.