Header for Developing and Managing the Brown University Collections


Developing and Managing the Brown University Library Collections

Selection Criteria | Collecting Levels | Fund Allocation
Policies by Subject | Special Collections
| Government Documents | Course Reserves Reference | Support for New Courses and Programs

 

Mission and General Goals

The Brown University Library, in support of the University's educational and research mission, is the local repository for and the principal gateway to current information and the scholarly record.  As such, it is simultaneously collection, connection, and classroom, primarily for the current and future students and faculty of the University, while also serving other colleagues in the University community and our regional, national, and global communities of learning and scholarship

In support of this mission, the Library acquires information resources in a variety of formats: e.g., books, journals, newspapers, CD-ROM's, video and audio tapes, digital files. We also acquire access to information, through direct licensing from authorized providers, establishing connections to free resources, or making consortial or exchange agreements with publishers, libraries, or other organizations. This document will refer to all of these resources as the Library's collections, whether they are owned, leased, or borrowed, and whether or not they reside physically in the Library.

The Library selects resources for its collections primarily in support of the current and anticipated curriculum of the University, and secondarily in support of the current and anticipated individual research needs of our faculty and students. Beyond these goals, we seek to maintain the vitality of particular collections of notable strength in relation to other regional, national, or international collections.

In additional to collecting these resources, the Library is called to promote their use among the Brown community and outside of it, through cataloging the collections as well as more focused outreach to potential users. We are also charged with the ongoing maintenance and preservation of those resources that may be of long-term usefulness for our selected fields of research.

Selection Criteria: General

Since the Library, like its counterparts at other universities, does not have sufficient resources to acquire everything published in areas pertinent to the University's programs, library materials selectors employ the following general criteria when evaluating titles to be added or removed from the collections. Particular criteria assume greater or lesser importance depending on the type of material under consideration, the resources available, the stated acquisitions commitment level as detailed elsewhere in this policy statement and the subject matter covered.

  1. Relevance to the actual or potential needs of Brownâs educational and research programs
    Library materials selectors maintain close ties with the departments, institutes, and research programs, which comprise the primary user group for a particular subject or area. Additionally, they keep, for resource development purposes, records of research activities, grants received, and the curriculum for their areas. This information permits selectors to anticipate and provide for current and changing needs of Brownâs faculty and students.
  2. Scope and content
    Selectors must gauge each acquisition in terms of the breadth and depth of information needed by their primary user groups and quality of the research being presented. Overall, however, library materials selectors comprehensively collect important general monographs related to the research interests of the Brown community, and selectively acquire more specialized treatments. Similarly, for periodicals, preference is given to titles whose coverage is of sufficient breadth to be of use and interest to an entire department, while those of interest to a small number of individuals, are collected selectively.
  3. Depth of the existing collection in the subject and local availability of the item
    When considering the purchase of a new title, a selector must also consider the strengths and weaknesses of the existing collection in which the new title will be located. While we do generally build upon strengths, unneeded redundancy is avoided. We do purchase duplicates where high use is expected. Availability of expensive or tangential titles through consortial arrangements is also considered and an access instead of ownership option may be considered.
  4. Quality
    The quality of a title must be evaluated weighing several subjective factors collectively, i.e., its sponsorship; scholarship; level of creativity; lasting value; the reputation of the author, the publisher, the contributors, the editorial board; the quality and importance of the illustrations; bibliographies included, etc. None of these is the deciding factor alone but each are considered as they contribute to or detract from the overall quality of the item under consideration.
  5. Currency and timeliness
    Many disciplines, particularly in the sciences, require up-to-date information. In those areas, preference is given to titles which report new and revised information in a timely fashion.
  6. Bibliographic accessibility
    The contents of periodicals, particularly, require bibliographic indexing and abstracting (I/A) tools to insure sufficient user access. Inclusion or exclusion from the major I/A tools is one of characteristic employed by selectors when evaluating the subscription to a periodical magazine or journal.
  7. Price
    The value of a book, periodical, newspaper, etc. to the collection cannot be measured only by considering its price. The price, however, in addition to the other criteria mentioned here, has to be considered when evaluating a purchase. When evaluating "free" materials, the cost of acquisitions processing, cataloging, shelving, and preservation must also be considered.
  8. Language and country of origin
    The language of the primary and secondary users of each title under consideration must be considered. The Libraries do collect social science and humanities materials in most languages to support its extensive area studies programs.

Selection Criteria: Specific Formats

a.  Serials   
Serials represent a long-term, continuing commitment of library funds for subscription costs, processing, and housing. Because the selection of periodicals and serial publications exerts an important influence on the shape of the Library's collections (and a major impact on the Library's budget), it is essential that each title be reviewed in relation to the guidelines below.

b. Newspapers c. Electronic Resources d. Internet Resources e. Maps

Collecting Levels

Fund Allocation

The materials budget is split into three major categories: serials, approvals, and firm orders. To these we might add a fourth - sets - but in the final reporting this category appears among the firm orders.

Fiscal and programmatic funds. 
The money for information resources actually resides in numerous funds, the largest of which is the general annual allocation from the University. This fund is unrestricted. Most other funds, including endowments and cash funds, are restricted to purchasing certain kinds of material or particular subjects. The allocations we make to support the various academic programs are, in effect, another layer placed over these existing funds, which we will call fiscal funds. The Acquisitions Department tries, through the year, to fit the fiscal funds (restricted and unrestricted) to our theoretical programmatic allocation. The programmatic allocation, then, is flexible, and should not be viewed as concrete. Under-expenditures in one discipline may well be offset by over-expenditures in another, without any formal reallocation of funds.

The programmatic allocations have generally been made according to historical precedent. That is, they are based largely upon past expenditures, with some adjustments made to accommodate changes in publishing and in program needs. It is expected that changes, adjustments, and overlaps in fund allocations for programmatic areas will be dealt with more efficiently in the context of the recently established broad Discipline Groups - History & Area Studies, Humanities, Science & Medicine, and Social Sciences.

Collection Development Footer

Search Josiah 

Boston Library Consortium Worldcat
Suggest a Purchase Contact a Selector Questions/Comments
Collection Policy Home Scholarly Resources  Library Home


This page was last updated on: Tuesday, 30-Jan-2001 21:06:44 EST.
© 2000, Brown University Library. All rights reserved.

You are the 7,189th visitor to this page.