╨╧рб▒с>■  ■                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Root Entry         └FАї╓O+╦ А1Table    1$ WordDocument        $FSummaryInformation(    Р¤   ■   ■                    +            ■                   #"■   %&'()*0,-./;                                        <=I!                                        JKM    NOR        S>                                                                                                                                                                                ■   ■    ■    !"#$%&'()*+,-./0■   23456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTU■                                                                                                                                                                           DocumentSummaryInformation8             CompObj            X0Table            Я            Root Entry         └FАnCL+╦1Table    2R WordDocument        1FSummaryInformation(    Р                ¤   ■   ■    +■                           "■                                   ,-./;    2345678        <=I!                                        JKM    NOR        S>                                                                                                                                                                                DocumentSummaryInformation8             CompObj            X0Table            Я            ■   ■    ■    !"#$%&'()*+,-./0■       3456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVW■                                                                                                                                                                   nderstand the impact of the work on the community, and advise the project on how to best serve local stakeholders and ease potential tensions. Hodder cites specifically tensions between the УGoddessФ tours that visit ╟atalhЎy№k and the local Islamic requirements for women, and how his team includes a researcher specifically dedicated to studying and dealing with that issue, one that at first glance seems to have nothing to do with archaeology (Hodder 2003, 142). Presentation is another key element to consider when thinking of potential audiences. Once it has been accepted that archaeological work is meant for a broader audience than the scientific community How do the authors deal with the politics & practicalities of communicating their work to wider audiences? Noting trend towards commercialization and interactive voices, moving away from multivocality. (Silberman, 140). For widest possible audience, comes at expense of the dizzying array of perspectives. (Silberman, 141) It is clear then, that in our investigations at the JBH, we need to take into account potential stakeholders. The most immediately evident of these stakeholders are the Joukowsky Institute itself, which has approved the class, and hopes to see us get something out of our work here, along with the JBH staff who have approved and guided our research, hoping to use our findings so that they may better serve the interests of the public. However, these are simply our hands-on stakeholders, those who exert an obviously controlling influence over the project. We must also be conscious of our duty to those who will come after us: the students who will take the class next year. They will require a very different type of presentation than will our other stakeholders, the greater Brown community, visitors to the Institute, those simply interested in our work here. For our followers, we must have detailed scientific notes and explanations, ideas we have about future projects, places for them to begin their work: the same type of information our predecessors left for us. For the interested public, it will be necessary to have a more colorful and generalized portrayal. However, we should be cautious not to fall into the traps Silberman warns of: sacrificing the complexity and tangled perspectives of true archaeological interpretation for the sake of entertaining the Уwidest possible audienceФ (Silberman 2008, 141). We are lucky that our work at the JBH is relatively free of commercial interest, but as college students we should be wary of both our social desire to simply entertain our classmates and the urge to comfortably immerse ourselves in the strictly academic type of work we are accustomed to producing at school. Our final projects will walk a line between these two influences, but by being aware of them, and of the specific audiences that take an interest in our work, we may produce work that will speak to everyone. agleyld Fagley i(@ё (NormalCJmH <A@Є б<Default Paragraph FontХ.    !  аzЩ   аzЩёХ(Дa ёЄєЧ└!uп└!uп └!uп└!uп└!uп└!uп(Дa ёЄєЧШ0ААРЬи└╠▄ Ї  ( 4@HPX'ososHarold FagleyoaroNormalFHarold Fagleyo45oMicrosoft Word 10.0@ X8 @l 8A╦@Ж2U╦ъъ  i(@ё (NormalCJmH <A@Є б<Default Paragraph FontУ.    !  аzЩ   аzЩёУв(Дa ёХ└!uп└!uп └!uп└!uп└!uпЖnt╞╠шЄ╘┌9?■ # g q N T ╔ ╥ Ье╔╥t}ХшўЇХ:::   Harold Fagley,Home:Users:haroldfagley:Desktop:Arch Paper 1 @АЁЁМXжъъЁЁ║∙ДД╨^Д`Д╨Д╨`Д╨8'(a  " ' ( + 1 2 5 Q Y y С Ф ╞ ╔ ┘ ▐ р 9 p ▒ ╣ ├ ╥ eДЕСЬй▒ЁёТУQ>Q >Q0>Q4>Q<>PN>P6@Qи#@Q.Q0QP0QZ0Q\0Qb0Qn0Qp0Qv0Qо0Q╛0Q■0Q.1Q41QШ1QЮ1Qе└┤┤А24g ╚   Harold Fagley Harold Fagleyе└┤┤А24█╚   Harold Fagley Harold Fagley Harold Fagley Harold Fagleyagley i(@ё (NormalCJmH <A@Є б<Default Paragraph FontУ.    !  аzЩ   аzЩ   аzЩ}ёУфв(Дa ёХ └!ы^ └!h f └!■r@ └!╙0K └!З{(Дa ХШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААЬААЖnt╞╠шЄ╘┌9?■ # g q N T ╔ ╥ Ье╔╥t}ХшўЇХ:::   Harold Fagley,Home:Users:haroldfagley:Desktop:Arch Paper 1 @АМXж::║∙dрДД╨dр^Д`Д╨Д╨dр`Д╨8'(a  " ' ( + 1 2 5 Q Y y С Ф ╞ ╔ ┘ ▐ р 9 p ▒ ╣ ├ ╥ eДЕСЬй▒ЁёТУQ>Q >Q0>Q4>Q<>PN>P6@Qи#@Q.Q0QP0QZ0Q\0Qb0Qn0Qp0Qv0Qо0Q╛0Q■0Q.1Q41QШ1QЮ1Q╛1Q2Q4QX4Q6Qn6Q8Q8Q@QBQzBQЖBQИBQ&CQdCQfCQ~CQФCQоCQ╛CP╞'@Q╚'@P 7@Ш0ААШ0ААЪ0ААШ0ААШ0ААШ0ААЖnt╞╠шЄ╘┌9?■ # g q N T ╔ ╥ Юз╦╘vЧшўЇЧ:::   Harold Fagley,Home:Users:haroldfagley:Desktop:Arch Paper 1 @АЁЁМXжъъЁЁ║∙ДД╨^Д`Д╨8'(a  " ' ( + 1 2 5 Q Y y С Ф ╞ ╔ ┘ ▐ р 9 p ▒ ╣ ├ ╥ eДЕСЬй▒ЁёФХQ>Q >Q0>Q4>Q<>PN>P6@Qи#@Q.Q0QP0QZ0Q\0Qb0Qn0Qp0Qv0Qо0Q╛0Q■0Q.1Q41QШ1QЮ1Q╛1Q2Q4QX4Q6Qn6Q8Q8Q@QB╛1Q2Q4QX4Q6Qn6Q8Q8Q@QBQzBQЖBQИBQ&CQdCQfCQ~CQФCQоCQ╛CP╞'@P╚'@P 7@GРTimes New Roman5РАSymbol3Р Arial3РTimes qИ╨hтAы&yBы&-Bъъ ще└┤┤А24g ╚   Harold Fagley Harold F■      └FMicrosoft Word Document■   NB6WWord.Document.8■  ╒═╒Ь.УЧ+,∙о0Ё hpДМФЬ дм┤╝ ─ ╤' Macromediaag $  Title■  рЕЯЄ∙OhлС+'│┘0`ИQzBQЖBQИBQ&CQdCQfCQ~CQФCQоCQ╛CP┬'@P─'@P 7@GРTimes New Roman5РАSymbol3Р Arial3РTimes qИ╨hтAы&xBы&,Aъъ щGРTimes New Roman5РАSymbol3Р Arial3РTimes qИ╨hтAы&yBы&/BCЭ 'щ■      └FMicrosoft Word Document■   NB6WWord.Document.8■  ╒═╒Ь.УЧ+,∙о0Ё hpДМФЬ дм┤╝ ─ ╤' Macromediaa' █$  Title■  рЕЯЄ∙OhлС+'│┘0`ИThe desire to make the presentation enjoyable for the widest number of people sacrifices much of the complexity of the archaeological interpretation; it is difficult to display a tale of many tortuously conflicting analyses while still holding the attention of the average site visitor.РЬи└╠▄ Ї  ( 4@HPX'ososHarold FagleyoaroNormalFHarold Fagleyo47oMicrosoft Word 10.0@ X8 @l 8A╦@Ж2U╦CЭ i(@ё (NormalCJmH <A@Є б<Default Paragraphье┴@ Ї┐ЖjbjbЛюЛюЛюЛюЛюЛюЛюЛюЛюЛюЛюFсМсМУ      lЦЦЦЦЦЦюTЮЮЮЮ к B╝ъ┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬      ,ж ╞^LpЦ┬┬┬┬┬LвЦЦ┬┬┬ввв┬▓Ц┬Ц┬вк"╠"ЦЦЦЦ┬в|вЦЦ╢ G└¤╚B\Юt.╝╝$ в$ в├х There have always been a variety of stakeholders in archaeological work. As much as archaeologists might wish for it to be a pure science unto itself, it seems that in these more interconnected and hopefully enlightened times that archaeology must no longer be Уjust about diggingФ (Hodder 2003, 143). Throughout the history of archaeology, the field has been used to justify a great range of perspectivesЕ Archaeology has always been entangled with larger social questions. It was the history of civic nationalism in the United States that made early American archaeology a possibility. In the 1800s, although the marginalization of Native Americans in society made the study of their past a similarly insignificant field, the prominence of ruins in the landscape of the Southwest United States drew archaeologists from across the country, contributing to Уa rising sense of regional identityФ (McManamon 2003, 122). However, the practice of archaeology has been perceived by many as an appropriation of the past by Western elitist interests, by subjugating the history and culture of a people to a science with a European/American academic framework. Increasingly, the theory that archaeologists Уjust digФ seems to smack of colonialism (Hodder 2003, 146). Still, many archaeological projects go ahead without consideration of the impact of the work on relevant stakeholders outside academia. This is a recipe for conflict between archaeologists and local stakeholders; even reporting what archaeologists believe to be relatively objective facts can be a highly sensitive issue. Hodder says of his excavations at ╟atalhЎy№k that Уwe might say the bones from the site indicate that the Neolithic inhabitants were eating pig. In an area of Islamic fundamentalism, statements about which we would not normally think twice become politically chargedФ (Hodder 2003, 145). Therefore, it is necessary to work out methods of presentation, interpretation, and approach that acknowledge the impacts of all stakeholders to a project. Making sЖ╚12▓427B8:<0>P>@* ure that archaeological work is communicated effectively to a wider audience is a challenge, given the sometimes dizzying number of potential stakeholder groups involved. Hodder suggests likening the practice of archaeology to sustainable tourism: we are only Уpassing throughФ, and we Уhave a responsibility to other visitors and to the need for sustainable travelФ (Hodder 2003, 142). This responsibility is approached by some by including sociologists and anthropologists in archaeological work, to better uье┴@ Ї┐ЖjbjbЛюЛюЛюЛюЛюЛюЛюЛюЛюЛюЛюFсМсМУ      lЦЦЦЦЦЦ┌T.... : .7ъRRRRRRRRо░░░░░░,! A^▄[ЦRRRRR▄2ЦЦRRR222R▓ЦRЦRо2к┬ЦЦЦЦRо2|2оЦЦоF A└¤╚...оо77оЯ2Яо2├х There have always been a variety of stakeholders in archaeological work. As much as archaeologists might wish for it to be a pure science unto itself, it seems that in these more interconnected and hopefully enlightened times that archaeology must no longer be Уjust about diggingФ (Hodder 2003, 143). Throughout the history of archaeology, the field has been used to justify a great range of perspectivesЕ Archaeology has always been entangled with larger social questions. It was the history of civic nationalism in the United States that made early American archaeology a possibility. In the 1800s, although the marginalization of Native Americans in society made the study of their past a similarly insignificant field, the prominence of ruins in the landscape of the Southwest United States drew archaeologists from across the country, contributing to Уa rising sense of regional identityФ (McManamon 2003, 122). However, the practice of archaeology has been perceived by many as an appropriation of the past by Western elitist interests, by subjugating the history and culture of a people to a science with a European/American academic framework. Increasingly, the theory that archaeologists Уjust digФ seems to smack of colonialism (Hodder 2003, 146). Still, many archaeological projects go ahead without consideration of the impact of the work on relevant stakeholders outside academia. This is a recipe for conflict between archaeologists and local stakeholders; even reporting what archaeologists believe to be relatively objective facts can be a highly sensitive issue. Hodder says of his excavations at ╟atalhЎy№k that Уwe might say the bones from the site indicate that the Neolithic inhabitants were eating pig. In an area of Islamic fundamentalism, statements about which we would not normally think twice become politically chargedФ (Hodder 2003, 145). Therefore, it is necessary to work out methods of presentation, interpretation, and approach that acknowledge the impacts of all stakeholders to a project. Making sure that archaeological work is communicated effectively to a wider audience is a challenge, given the sometimes dizzying number of potential stakeholder groups involved. Hodder suggests likening the practice of archaeology to sustainable tourism: we are only Уpassing throughФ, and we Уhave a responsibility to other visitors and to the need for sustainable travelФ (Hodder 2003, 142). This responsibility is approached by some by including sociologists and anthropologists in archaeological work, to better utively objective facts can be a highly sensitive issue. Hodder says of his excavations at ╟atalhЎy№k that Уwe might say the bones from the site indicate that the Neolithic inhabitants were eating pig. In an area of Islamic fundamentalism, statements about which we would not normally think twice become politically chargedФ (Hodder 2003, 145). Therefore, it is necessary to work out methods of presentation, interpretation, and approach that acknowledge the impacts of all stakeholders to a project. Making sure that archaeological work is communicated effectively to a wider audience is a challenge, given the sometimes dizzying number of potential stakeholder groups involved. Hodder suggests likening the practice of archaeology to sustainable tourism: we are only Уpassing throughФ, and we Уhave a responsibility to other visitors and to the need for sustainable travelФ (Hodder 2003, 142). This responsibility is approached by some by including sociologists and anthropologists in archaeological work, to better uЪЫў ╘ЭЮ туфЖP>¤¤¤¤ў¤¤¤¤¤¤¤Д╨`Д╨ ЪЫў ╘ЭЮ туфЖ ░╨/ ░р=!░"░#Ра$Ра%░e than the scientific community, the question becomes how best to engage with that audience. Recently, archaeological presentation has been trending toward a theme-park style of presentation; multimedia displays and actors in costume are co bottom line. Ж╚12▓427B8:<0>P>@√∙5Б5Б>* ЪЫў ╘ЭЮ туфЖP>¤¤¤¤ў¤¤¤¤¤¤¤Д╨`Д╨ ЪЫў ╘ЭЮ туфЖ ░╨/ ░р=!░"░#Ра$Ра%░e than the scientific community, the question becomes how best to engage with that audience. Recently, archaeological presentation has been trending toward a theme-park style of presentation; multimedia displays and actors in costume are coThis type of presentation, while engaging to an intentionally wide variety of audiences, is a product of a desire to make archaeology marketable. At the end of the day, the stakeholder with the most influence is the corporate bottom line. mmon elements of a site, transforming it into  a mosaic of sound bytes and video bytes incorporated into a seamless experience that defines the visitor s perception of the overall significance of the site (Silberman 2008, 141). This type of presentation, while engaging to an intentionally wide variety of audiences, is the commercial bottom line. is a product of a desire to make archaeology marketable. At the end of the day, the stakeholder with the most influence is the corporate bottom line. is the commercial bottom line. bottom line. bottom line. , and is , and is WEEK 8 CRITICAL RESPONSE Ben Jones