Please check back for updates on next year's events!
Join us for an Ethical Inquiry lecture "The Good of Friendship" by Alexander Nehamas, the Edmund N. Carpenter II Class of 1943 Professor in the Humanities, of Philosophy and of Comparative Literature at Princeton University. The lecture will held on February 24th, from 4PM to 6PM, and a reception will immediately follow the lecture.
Alexander Nehamas joined Princeton in 1971 with Philosophical interests in Greek philosophy, philosophy of art, European philosophy and literary theory. As described by his website: Influenced by the place of philosophy in the life of Ancient Greece and Rome as well as by Nietzsche, he questions the transformation of philosophy from a way of living into a purely academic discipline. Similarly, he holds the view that the arts constitute an indispensable part of human life and not a separate domain, of interest only to a few.
He has translated Plato's Symposium and Phaedrus into English, as well as published several books including Nietzsche: Life as Literature, The Art of Living: Socratic Reflections from Plato to Foucault, Virtues of Authenticity: Essays on Plato and Socrates, and Only a Promise of Happiness: The Place of Beauty in a World of Art .
Please join the Philosophy Department for "Free Speech and Civil Disobedience" presented by Martha Nussbaum, University of Chicago, from 4PM to 6PM in Room 130 of the Building for Environmental Research and Technology (BERT), 85 Waterman Street.
Free speech and civil disobedience both generate intense controversy on university campuses. But the two are often confused, and it is important not to confuse them. This lecture will distinguish them and make some recommendations for how campuses should handle a variety of types of civil disobedience.
Martha Nussbaum is the Ernst Freund Distinguished Service Professor of Law and Ethics at the University of Chicago. She has taught at Harvard and Oxford Universities, and from 1984 to 1995 at Brown.
Join us for the Ethical Inquiry lecture Happiness is Not for Sale, But You Are: How the Market Economy Structures the Pursuit of Happiness by Benjamin Radcliff, Professor of Political Science at the University of Notre Dame on October 28th from 4PM to 6PM in Smith Buonanno Hall, Room 106.
Abstract: Our understanding of happiness must be grounded in our understanding of the market economy. A central aspect of capitalism is the "commodification" of labor and thus the commodification of persons themselves. The material and psychological burden of being "reduced to commodities" compels citizens to attempt to introduce countervailing forces in society that limit the extent of commodification. Across countries, and across the American States, data suggest that the single most important determinant of well-being is indeed the level of decommodification (as expressed through the social safety net, labor unions, and pro-worker labor market protections, such as the minimum wage). The magnitude of the relationship between decommodification and happiness dwarfs conventional individual-level factors, such as marital status or unemployment.
His work analyzes political outcomes and quality of life for citizens of democracies, primarily in the United States. This research is particularly focused on electoral politics, public policy, labor unions, and democratic theory.
His most recent book is entitled The Political Economy of Human Happiness.
Join us for the Ethical Inquiry lecture The Cultural Relativity of Happiness presented by Shigehiro Oishi, Professor of Psychology, University of Virginia on October 7th from 4PM to 6PM in the Petteruti Lounge, Stephen Robert '62 Campus Center, 75 Waterman Street.
Abstract: Once believed to be universal, a growing body of research shows that both the conception and predictors of happiness vary cross-culturally. First, the meaning and importance of happiness varies both across time and between nations. Americans, for instance, tend to define happiness in terms of pleasure or enjoyment and view happiness as universally positive, whereas East Asian and Middle Eastern cultures may highlight the transient and socially disruptive nature of happiness and be ambivalent about whether it is good. Second, predictors of happiness vary between cultures. Recent work highlights new mediators (e.g., relational mobility), individual predictors (e.g., person-culture fit), societal factors (e.g., good governance and wealth), within-culture variations (e.g., at the state or city level), and interventions (e.g., practicing gratitude) that differ cross-culturally or help explain cultural differences in happiness. Though many questions remain, this review highlights how these recent advances broaden and revise our understanding of culture and happiness.
Shigehiro Oishi's work centers on culture, social ecology, personality, and well-being. His research goals are to uncover the causes and consequences of subjective well-being, and to delineate how social ecology and human psyche make each other up. Specific research topics include residential mobility, life satisfaction, feeling understood and misunderstood, relationship satisfaction, self-concepts, pro-community behaviors, goals and values, and emotion.
He has published dozens of articles and two books, The Psychological Wealth of Nations: Do Happy People Make a Happy Society and Doing the Science of Happiness: What we learned from Psychology (in Japanese).
To see a prior year's events, please click on the academic year below: