Funding Announcements and Opportunities

Awards with Limited Submission Policies

Many funding agencies and foundations have established limited submission policies and will only review a limited number of applications from each institution. The process for limited submissions at Brown, lead by the Vice President for Research, in coordination with the Dean of Medicine and Biological Sciences, Dean of Public Health, and the Dean of the Faculty, starts with an announcement from the Office of the Vice President for Research (OVPR) with a deadline for an internal review of applications/nominations. The offices of the Dean of Medicine and Biological Sciences, Dean of Public Health, and/or the Dean of Faculty will take part in the review process in coordination with a faculty review committee, and the Provost will be consulted regarding the final decision.

The OVPR maintains a searchable database of limited submission opportunities that can be viewed on their website.

For more information, please contact Margaret Manning, Research Development and Support Program Manager, at (401) 863-5145

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Social Science Research Council

Open Competitions:

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Fellowship

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

United States Department of Labor, Bureau of International Labor Affairs

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of International Labor Affairs (USDOL/ILAB) has published a Notice of Intent (NOI) to solicit cooperative agreement applications.  Subject to the availability of funds, USDOL/ILAB intends to award a cooperative agreement(s) through a competitive and merit-based process.  

The NOI is available at the following link:

  • NOI-ILAB-17-01: Labor Market Supply and Demand in the Northern Triangle: Leveraging Data to Build an Efficient Labor Market

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

National Endowment for the Humanities

Brown University faculty members are welcome to contact Kate Duggan in the Office of the Vice President for Research to discuss either of the NEH opportunities below, or for assistance connecting with potential collaborators in other disciplines at Brown.

Collaborative Research Grants

FOA: 20171206-RZ

Proposals Due: December 6, 2017 (November 28 in OSP)

Award Amount & Duration: varies by project type; see below for details

Collaborative Research grants support groups of two or more scholars engaging in significant and sustained research in the humanities. The program seeks to encourage interdisciplinary work, both within the humanities and beyond. Projects that include partnerships with researchers from the natural and social sciences are encouraged, but they must remain firmly rooted in the humanities and must employ humanistic methods. Eligible projects must propose tangible and sustainable outcomes that are based on and must convey interpretive humanities research. All grantees are expected to disseminate the results of their work to scholarly audiences and/or general audiences.

  • Convening Grants – up to $50,000
    • Convening grants last one year and typically fund conferences and working group meetings to sharpen the chosen research topic and discuss and plan subsequent publication.
  • Publication Grants – up to $250,000 (no more than $100,000 per year)
    • Publication grants last one to three years and support the project toward completion of its publication goals. Publications can appear in traditional print or in digital form. Note that costs paid to publishers and subventions are not supported.
  • Archaeology Grants – up to $250,000 (no more than $100,000 per year)
    • Archaeology grants last one to three years and support projects that lead to publication.

Scholarly Editions and Translations Grants

FOA: 20171206-RQ

Proposals Due: December 6, 2017 (November 28 in OSP)

Award Amount: up to $100,000 total per year

Award Duration: 1-3 years

Scholarly Editions and Translations grants support the preparation of editions and translations of pre-existing texts of value to the humanities that are currently inaccessible or available only in inadequate editions or transcriptions. Typically, the texts and documents are significant literary, philosophical, and historical materials; but other types of work, such as musical notation, are also eligible. Projects must be undertaken by at least one editor or translator and one other collaborating scholar.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Global Innovation Fund (GIF) for Researchers

GIF is a nonprofit fund which invests in innovations that have the potential to benefit millions of people in the developing world living on less than $5/day, and especially those living on less than $2.  Research plays a central role: as a source of innovative ideas, and as a tool for assessing their impact, cost-effectiveness, and scalability.

GIF construes “innovations” broadly to include behavioral nudges and organizational innovations as well as hardware and software.  Some examples include:

  • The Behavioural Insights Team’s work on improving tax compliance
  • A training system for skills and entrepreneurship developed by Educate!, a Ugandan organization.
  • Segovia’s system for facilitating cash transfers to vulnerable populations
  • Simprint’s rugged biometric identification system
  • Sparkmeter’s technologies to promote access to electricity.  

GIF is interested in supporting policy reforms that could improve the equity or efficiency of public sector performance.  They support investments in public, private, and nonprofit activities, using all available financial instruments.

The role of research and evidence at GIF

Evidence is at the heart of GIF’s staged approach to investment. GIF takes well-informed risks in pursuit of high social benefits. To do so, they embed learning into each investment. They want to know things like: does this innovation improve poor people’s well-being?   How?  Under what conditions? By how much? Does it promote gender equality? Is it cost-effective? How sensitive is demand to income and price?  The answers will guide decisions by GIF and others on whether and how to scale up the innovations.

There are several ways for researchers to get involved.

  • If you have an innovative idea that you’d like to test for proof of concept, you can apply for a pilot grant (up to $230,000).  If you’re past the pilot stage and ready to rigorously test impact and cost-effectiveness, you can apply for a test and transition grant (up to $2.3 million).
  • If you are interested in evaluating an innovation being implemented by a government, business, or NGO, team up with them and apply for funding.  The application could come either from the implementer or the researcher.  For innovations that already have good supporting evidence and want to generate further learning as they expand and evolve, total funding can go up to $15 million.
  • If you’ve already evaluated an innovation and found it to be promising, let them know about it, and encourage the innovator to apply to GIF for scale-up.
  • GIF is also eager to hear from researchers with innovative approaches to reducing the cost and improving the utility of monitoring and evaluation, including promotion of feedback for adaptive implementation of projects.

While many of GIF’s projects involve randomized controlled trials, GIF is not dogmatic on research methodology. They seek the techniques -- or combination of techniques -- that will best address the questions at hand. Their smaller, pilot-stage projects focus on proof of concept, and might, for instance, include field-testing for efficacy or assessing household demand for a new product.  Test and transition projects generally aim at rigorously assessing impact or cost-effectiveness, together with getting insight on factors affecting further scale-up, or replication in other settings.

Application process

GIF accepts applications on an ongoing basis.  A simple two-page initial application can be submitted here.  Applications are reviewed monthly. Projects selected for further diligence will then be asked to submit a full application of 15 pages.  Applications that pass internal review are submitted to a decision panel, which recommends funding.

Criteria for funding

Innovation - Research should promote real-world implementation of an innovative approach to an important development challenge.  Innovations are things that make it easier, faster, less costly, or otherwise more feasible to achieve a development result than current practice.  This includes testing to see if a result demonstrated in one context applies in others.

Potential impact - GIF is looking for innovations that make a big difference.  These are innovations that, if scaled up or replicated, could make a substantial difference to millions of lives, or perhaps a transformative difference to hundreds of thousands. Target innovations have social benefits that far outweigh social costs.

Poverty focus - Target innovations are those that can improve the lives of those living at $5/day, and especially those subsisting on less than $2/day.  This criterion is applied at the level of the beneficiary.  So while GIF works mostly in low-income countries or provinces, it could consider, for instance, innovations that help impoverished slum-dwellers in a middle-income country.

Potential for and pathway to scale - GIF wants to support ideas that scale up.  There are many potential paths to scale, including:

  • Organic growth of a for-profit or non-profit organization
  • Demonstration of an innovation that gets taken up by the public sector, e.g. in health or education delivery
  • Creation of an open-source innovation that is spontaneously emulated 

Researchers are not necessarily expected to be the agents who scale up an innovation.  However, research questions should be framed so that the answers inform decisions about whether and how to scale up the innovation.   At the pilot stage, applicants should be able to specify one or more potential pathways to scale, but GIF recognizes that there may be considerable uncertainty at this stage.  At the Test & Transition stage, GIF expects applicants to specify potential pathways to scale, and more favorably views applicants with progress towards securing support from partners for scaling the innovation, should it test successfully.  

Team - The quality of the team is an important criterion for selection.  Teams should be able to demonstrate strong knowledge of the problems they are addressing and an understanding of the setting in which the innovation will be tested.  GIF encourages applications from women and from researchers and organizations based in developing countries.

Measuring success and sharing lessons learned - GIF is interested in assessing the causal impact of innovations on outcomes closely related to people’s well-being. GIF is also keenly interested in cost-effectiveness.  GIF looks for a commitment to share results and lessons. While GIF’s research goal is improving people’s lives, not publication for its own sake, GIF encourages publication of results in academic journals where appropriate.

No basic or laboratory research - GIF doesn’t support theoretical research or laboratory based research. 

For further information:

Please see GIF’s website at http://www.globalinnovation.fund  or send an email to: hello@globalinnovation.fund.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Announcement Archive