Date May 2, 2023
Media Contact

Amid gender disparities among faculty nationally, Brown’s task force on women faculty issues report

Commitment to equal opportunity prompts analysis that finds no gender-based differences between men and women faculty in some areas at Brown, and others where the University must take steps to improve.

PROVIDENCE, R.I. [Brown University] — After an extensive data-driven analysis focused on representation, equity and inclusion, a task force appointed to examine the status of women faculty at Brown University issued its final report on Tuesday, May 2. The report documents multiple areas in which no gender-based differences were found at Brown, despite disparities among women and men faculty nationally, and identifies other areas in which the University can improve.

Recognizing that women have been historically underrepresented in faculty ranks nationally and at Brown, President Christina H. Paxson and then-Provost Richard M. Locke appointed the Task Force on the Status of Women Faculty in September 2021. They charged the group with assessing any disparities in opportunities and outcomes between women and men on the Brown faculty and making recommendations for changes that would advance the University’s mission of education and research.

The areas identified for improvement are reflected in eight task force recommendations that address expanding the number of women faculty at all ranks; ensuring equity in compensation, promotion, retention and service loads; developing improved mechanisms to address bias, harassment and misconduct; providing better information and support to faculty on human-resources related issues and improving access to childcare; and enhancing training for department chairs.

In a letter to the Brown community, Paxson said plans to address the task force’s recommendations would be shared in the fall.

“Brown has a long history of proactively confronting and addressing difficult issues, even as they are embedded in longstanding cultural realities and reflected in trends across the nation,” Paxson said. “The task force provides critical insights into the challenges of cultivating a diverse and talented faculty, and its recommendations offer a roadmap for how we can create solutions. Only with this full understanding of where we are succeeding, and where we must improve, can we fully take on the work of ensuring that every Brown faculty member has access to the same resources and opportunities, regardless of sex or gender identity.”

Brown has gained an international reputation for its record of proactively confronting issues of diversity, equity and equal opportunity, including the far-ranging efforts arising from the 2016 Pathways to Diversity and Inclusion: An Action Plan for Brown, commonly known as the University’s Diversity and Inclusion Action Plan.

“Brown is committed to ensuring that all members of our community are provided with equal opportunities and support to advance their careers and meet their full potential. As national conversations continue concerning employment disparities among men and women faculty, we felt it was important to examine the status of women faculty at Brown.

Christina H. Paxson President, Brown University
 
Christina H. Paxson

The work of the task force was motivated in part by annual reporting on the progress of the Diversity and Inclusion Action Plan. That reporting noted evidence that at Brown, women tenure-track faculty remain a minority in several disciplines, even those in which the majority of those graduating with doctoral degrees are women. Although this is an issue seen nationwide, Paxson said it was concerning given Brown’s commitment to sustaining a diverse academic community that will position the University to achieve the highest level of academic excellence.

Diane Lipscombe, a professor of neuroscience at Brown and director of the Carney Institute for Brain Science, chaired the task force, which included more than a dozen faculty from across the University.

"I want to thank President Paxson and former Provost Locke for establishing the task force, and to acknowledge the commitment, collegial discourse and critical insights of task force members,” Lipscombe said. “We are deeply grateful to the faculty who entrusted us with their sometimes difficult experiences, and to current and former women of the Brown community who paved the way for this report. We hope this report will be read, discussed and turned into action to make Brown the university of choice for all faculty.”

From representation and resources to climate and compensation

Among several findings, the task force’s extensive analysis found that, since 2012, the gender gap in time to promotion for women faculty at Brown from associate to full professor has narrowed, and there is no gender gap in salary among men and women faculty hired in the past decade. This reflects recent progress in addressing national disparities.

In addition, no gender-based differences were found in areas including faculty tenure rates; appointment of faculty to endowed chairs; faculty hiring across disciplines relative to the representation of women in candidate pools; salary for women and men lecturers; access to research resources; assignment of laboratory space; and documented service loads, among other areas.

And yet the report identifies multiple areas in which Brown can improve. As is the case nationally, women are underrepresented on the Brown faculty across all ranks and in all disciplines relative to the national pool of Ph.D. candidates, for example. Some faculty recounted instances of being subjected to perceived harassment on the basis of sex and/or race, disrespectful and dismissive language, and a lack of dignity and respect.

“While in many cases these and other data, described in detail in this report, are consistent with national indicators with respect to women in the academy, they are inconsistent with Brown’s stated values and the University community’s standards and expectations, and undermine the University’s commitment to excel in science and discovery, which requires a diversity of perspectives,” the task force states in the report.

“We are deeply grateful to the faculty who entrusted us with their sometimes difficult experiences, and to current and former women of the Brown community who paved the way for this report. We hope this report will be read, discussed and turned into action to make Brown the university of choice for all faculty.”

Diane Lipscombe Professor of Neuroscience and Director of the Carney Institute for Brain Science
 
Diane Lipscombe

In addition, despite the lack of gender gap among faculty hired in the last 10 years, the report found statistically significant salary differences between men and women faculty at Brown who started prior to 2012. An analysis of Fiscal Year 2021 showed that the average median salaries for women at Brown are 88% of men’s salaries. While the data for the last decade indicates significant progress, the fact that an overall pay gap remains reflects a national trend, the report notes.

“Women in full-time faculty roles [nationally] make roughly 82 cents for every dollar their men counterparts earn, according to the American Association of University Professors’ annual faculty compensation survey,” the report states. “Based on data from over 2,000 higher education institutions, the Chronicle of Higher Education reported that the average U.S. professor’s income for the 2020-21 academic year (nine-month salary) was $95,159 for men and $79,090 for women. This trend holds when data are restricted just to full professors, with men earning, on average, $131,160 compared to $111,953 for women. It is therefore not surprising that we heard many concerns about equity in compensation for women compared to their colleagues who are men.”

These differences at Brown are in part attributable to the historic legacy of the time to promotion to full professor, as women rank at the associate professor level for two years longer than men, on average. While there is no gender gap in salary among faculty hired in the past decade, the task force noted the need for active steps to ensure it does not reappear. The review of compensation data did not consider a number of other factors that could contribute to differences in compensation, such as home department, and the report therefore recommends further analysis to meet Brown’s goal to “promote and ensure equity across every dimension.”

Next steps for task force recommendations

To fulfill their charge, task force members worked over the course of 18 months to collect, evaluate and deliberate quantitative and qualitative data related to numerous aspects of the faculty experience at Brown, such as research, teaching, service, mentoring, assigned research space and campus climate. Members analyzed datasets provided by several administrative units; solicited input from Brown faculty in a variety of forms, including conversations with and anonymous feedback from current faculty members as well as former members of the faculty who have left Brown; and incorporated feedback from several University committees to prepare the final report.

Members also considered the status of past initiatives at Brown focused on areas the report investigated,  including issues of representation, equitable working terms and conditions, opportunities for career advancement and overall climate for women faculty. The task forced notes in the report that its work is rooted in a series of previous efforts at Brown to dismantle obstacles to gender equity among faculty — from the full merger of Pembroke College with the men’s college of Brown University in 1970, to a consent decree entered in 1977 to achieve full representation of women on the faculty, to measures initiated in recent years as part of the University’s Diversity and Inclusion Action Plan.

“While there has been progress over time at Brown and nationally with respect to the representation of women faculty, this report underscores that inequities by gender persist both at Brown and nationally,” the task force states in the report. “Only by revealing gender disparities and the policies, systems and structures perpetuating these gaps will the University be positioned to rectify matters and reach its full and greatest potential.”

Lipscombe noted that the insights of the late Meenakshi Narain, a longtime Brown physics professor who was a mentor and role model to hundreds of women in the physical sciences in the U.S., in India and across the world, were instrumental in the task force’s work.

In a cover letter accompanying the report, Paxson said that addressing the areas for improvement outlined in the report will take time and resolve, but that it’s vitally important for Brown to do so. She said the first step for the University is to accept the task force recommendation to “appoint an implementation team to develop an action plan to prioritize, spearhead and track implementation of the recommended actions” in coordination with Brown’s Faculty Executive Committee.

Additional data-gathering efforts — a campus climate survey, a faculty satisfaction survey and a childcare needs assessment — will culminate this summer and fall, and will provide more critical data on Brown community members’ experiences with opportunity, support and access. Next fall, Paxson and incoming Provost Frank Doyle will share the results of those efforts, as well as plans to address the full set of task force recommendations.

“Brown is committed to ensuring that all members of our community are provided with equal opportunities and support to advance their careers and meet their full potential,” Paxson said. “As national conversations continue concerning employment disparities among men and women faculty, we felt it was important to examine the status of women faculty at Brown. I am deeply grateful to the members of the task force for their dedicated efforts, and I look forward to continued work together to fully address representation, equity and inclusion with respect to women faculty at Brown.”