Date March 31, 2026
Media Contact

At Brown, renowned authors discuss the consequences of banning books, suppressing expression

In a conversation as part of the University’s Discovery Through Dialogue project, authors Edwidge Danticat and Lauren Groff discussed being writers and readers at a time when book banning is on the rise.

PROVIDENCE, R.I. [Brown University] — When author Edwidge Danticat first learned that her 2015 children’s storybook “Mama’s Nightingale: A Story of Immigration and Separation” about a young Haitian girl whose mother is detained as an undocumented immigrant was banned by a local school district, part of her was proud.

“I’m a child of dictatorship — I knew people who buried their books… so they wouldn’t be in danger,” Danticat said. “My parents did not want me to be a writer, because writers were killed in my community, so I kind of knew the power of the word.”

But she also felt a sense of alarm because she felt that her picture book was “innocuous.”

Danticat, a Haitian-American novelist and short-story writer who earned a master of fine arts in creative writing from Brown in 1993, was joined by fellow acclaimed fiction writer Lauren Groff on Monday, March 30, at Brown University’s Pembroke Hall for a conversation centered around writing, free expression and the power of art.

The talk, titled “Honest Conversations: Banned Books and Troublesome Texts,” was part of the University’s campus-wide Discovery Through Dialogue project, which brings leading scholars and innovators to campus to engage in deep and challenging conversations with students, faculty, staff and members of the public in the pursuit of academic excellence.

Matthew Guterl, Brown’s vice president for diversity and inclusion and a professor of Africana studies and American studies who moderated the discussion, said that organizations such as PEN America have documented nearly 23,000 instances of book removals or restrictions in U.S. public schools since 2021.

“What began as a sharp spike in parental challenges in local school board meetings has increasingly evolved into a systematic, state-sanctioned prescription, resulting in disturbing normalizations of censorship, disinformation and a comprehensive rewriting of history,” Guterl said.

Danticat, who is best known for her 1994 debut novel “Breath, Eyes, Memory,” an Oprah’s Book Club selection, spoke candidly about the risks associated with banning books, including those that might be considered by some to be “troublesome” or inappropriate  — such as texts that include mentions of sexual violence. 

She said that she’s been alarmed by specific instances in Florida where it seemed like “anybody could ban a book” by submitting a complaint that might lead to investigation.

“I thought that really was the most vicious part of it, that all these people were given this power to, in cases, ban books that in most cases they … didn’t even read the book, because they would misspell the authors’ name,” Danticat said. “They would misspell the titles.”

Ultimately, banning books is about control, said Groff, whose novel “Fates and Furies” was removed from school library shelves in some counties in Florida, where she lives, allegedly due to its sex scenes.

“A lot of these books are banned not because they’re political, but because the identity of the person is considered to be political,” said Groff, who owns the independent bookstore The Lynx in Gainesville, Florida, and is the author of five novels and three short story collections, including the recently published “Brawler.”

She said that many of the books that have been banned were written by authors who identify as racial minorities or members of the LGBTQIA+ community. “So it’s really targeted,” she said.

Groff, who was named one of the 100 most influential people by TIME magazine in 2024, said that as a mother of two teenage boys, she does not want “people who do not read telling my children what they can and cannot read — and that’s what this is about.”

Danticat and Groff also discussed the importance of engaging with “troublesome texts,” which could include books that a reader considers to be inappropriate, offensive, or simply challenging.

“Reading a book you hate forces you to think of why you hate it,” said Danticat, a professor of humanities at Columbia University. “… Having those texts that you are not neutral about is just as important, I think, especially for writers, because then you’re like, ‘Why isn’t this working for me?”

Groff said that, in her view, the purpose of art is to “earthquake.”

“If you’re reading just to escape your life, that’s fine, but don’t be misled into thinking you’re reading art,” Groff said. “Art is something that’s troublesome. Art changes you. Art makes you angry. Art summons negative emotions, like rage… and sometimes when people come up to me and say, ‘Your book made me really angry,’ I feel very happy because I don’t want you to read one of my books and be like, ‘Oh, it’s fine’… One of my jobs is to shake you and tell you to look at this thing differently.’”

The conversation series will continue on April 16 with an open-to-the-public conversation between human rights attorney and director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University Jameel Jaffer and constitutional law scholar Genevieve Lakier, who will speak about “Free Speech in Challenging Times.”